2020
DOI: 10.1111/1753-6405.12999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How rates of perinatal mental health screening in Australia have changed over time and which women are missing out

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last decade, several national initiatives have been introduced including the NPDI to improve prevention and early detection of antenatal and postnatal depression. However, screening coverage for expectant mothers remains suboptimal with one in five mothers who have reported emotionally distressed during pregnancy were not being screened both antenatally and postnatally as recommended by clinical practice guidelines [ 71 ]. Of those who were screened, almost two in five perinatal Australian women (38.9%) were not comfortable with enquiry about their depression or anxiety symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, several national initiatives have been introduced including the NPDI to improve prevention and early detection of antenatal and postnatal depression. However, screening coverage for expectant mothers remains suboptimal with one in five mothers who have reported emotionally distressed during pregnancy were not being screened both antenatally and postnatally as recommended by clinical practice guidelines [ 71 ]. Of those who were screened, almost two in five perinatal Australian women (38.9%) were not comfortable with enquiry about their depression or anxiety symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While actions at this level will have little impact on the political and social structures that generate social hierarchy, they may help prevent the generation of further inequalities and we recommend that action is taken to mitigate future effects on already disadvantaged families. We focused on research conducted in the UK, but detection and treatment disparities by ethnicity, age, parity and SES have been reported in other countries that recommend universal perinatal screening such as the US and Australia [49][50][51], are likely ubiquitous, and require similarly urgent attention.…”
Section: Implications For Policy and Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ATAPS sessions are not subsidised by Medicare, referral to this program requires the completion of a mental health plan using an appropriate MBS mental health item by a referring professional, such as a general practitioner or maternal health nurse. Previous research using ALSWH data has shown that self‐reported perinatal depression screening rates increased earlier in NSW than in other states 18 and while we have assumed for the purposes of this study that SAFE START came into complete effect on 1 April 2010, in reality some sites and health districts in NSW were well established prior to this time. This was further demonstrated in the final report of the beyondblue Postnatal Depression Screening Program: of the more than 40,000 women who participated in this landmark initiative between 2002 and 2005, over half (52.8%) were recruited from NSW, reflecting that procedures, policies and service networks had been well‐defined in NSW prior to the introduction of SAFE START 31…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Self‐reported depression screening rates among pregnant women and new mothers in Australia has increased significantly since 2000 18 . In NSW specifically, the proportion of women who reported being screened both before and after birth, as is currently recommended, increased from 25% in 2000 to 61% in 2016.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%