2012
DOI: 10.4169/math.mag.85.3.215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Rare Are Subgroups of Index 2?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Nganou [14] we can apply some basic, yet very useful, group theory facts to examine the index 2 subgroups of a given group.…”
Section: Index Two Subgroupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Nganou [14] we can apply some basic, yet very useful, group theory facts to examine the index 2 subgroups of a given group.…”
Section: Index Two Subgroupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can apply the Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory and the results in [4] about subgroups of index 2 to obtain the following.…”
Section: Number Of Intermediate Fields Of Degreementioning
confidence: 99%
“…4.2] that C 2 is cyclic of order m/gcd(2, m); and that (G1 ⊕ G 2 ) 2 = G 2 1 ⊕ G 2 2 for every groups G 1 , G 2 [4, Theorem 4]. 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now we prove (i) and (ii). It is known (see, e.g., ) that if G is any additive group, then 2G:=g+g|gG is a characteristic subgroup of G , the quotient G/2G is an elementary abelian 2‐group, and G has exactly |G/2G|1 subgroups of index 2. Now set |G|=2nd with d odd and let S be a Sylow 2‐subgroup of G .…”
Section: Enumerating 1‐rotational Hamiltonian Cycle Systems Up To Isomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) It is known (see, e.g., [35]) that if G is any additive group, then 2G := g + g | g ∈ G is a characteristic subgroup of G, the quotient G/2G is an elementary abelian 2-group, and G has exactly |G/2G| − 1 subgroups of index 2. Now set |G| = 2 n d with d odd and let S be a Sylow 2-subgroup of G. Considering that our group G is binary, then S is binary as well therefore S is either cyclic or dicyclic (see, e.g., [39], Theorem 4.4]) so that we have either |2S| = 2 n−1 or |2S| = 2 n−2 , respectively.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%