How prepared are we for cross-border outbreaks? An exploratory analysis of cross-border response networks for outbreaks of multidrug resistant microorganisms in the Netherlands and Germany

Abstract

Background The emergence and spread of multidrug resistant microorganisms is a serious threat to transnational public health. Therefore, it is vital that cross-border outbreak response systems are constantly prepared for fast, rigorous, and efficient response. This research aims to improve transnational collaboration by identifying, visualizing, and exploring two cross-border response networks that are likely to unfold during outbreaks involving the Netherlands and Germany. Methods Quantitative methods were used to explore response networks during a cross-border outbreak of carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae in healthcare settings. Eighty-six Dutch and German health professionals reflected on a fictive but realistic outbreak scenario (response rate ≈ 70%). Data were collected regarding collaborative relationships between stakeholders during outbreak response, prior working relationships, and trust in the networks. Network analysis techniques were used to analyze the networks on the network level (density, centralization, clique structures, and similarity of tie constellations between two networks) and node level (brokerage measures and degree centrality). Results Although stakeholders mainly collaborate with stakeholders belonging to the same country, transnational collaboration is present in a centralized manner. Integration of the network is reached, since several actors are beneficially positioned to coordinate transnational collaboration. However, levels of trust are moderately low and prior-existing cross-border working relationships are sparse. Conclusion Given the explored network characteristics, we conclude that the system has a promising basis to achieve effective coordination. However, future research has to determine what kind of network governance form might be most effective and efficient in coordinating the necessary cross-border response activity. Furthermore, networks identified in this study are not only crucial in times of outbreak containment, but should also be fostered in times of non-crisis.

Evaluating intra-action reviews at points of entry: ongoing learning opportunities during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…It is in these local settings that stakeholders represent different interests, all working towards both healthy, safe and ongoing travel and trade. Therefore, a tailor-made approach is desired in scarce but impactful crises such as pandemics [2], leading to a complex but crucial cooperation among stakeholders at PoE [3][4][5][6].…”

Experiences of seeking healthcare across the border: lessons to inform upstream policies and system developments on cross-border health in East Africa

“…Border communities, regardless of their size, are often regarded as peripheral in terms of social programmes but paradoxically have high priority in terms of national security and in allocation of citizenry privileges. 18 Of recent, border communities have also become of importance for public health surveillance due to threats like multidrug resistant TB, 19 Ebola outbreak experience in West Africa 20 and recently, the novel COVID-19. These threats can and have traversed borders as a result of inflows and outflows of people and goods across borders.…”