How postmetaphysical can God-talk be?

Abstract

A stalemate often ensues when science, philosophy and theology deliberate over the notion of metaphysics. It is apparent that these three disciplines approach metaphysics from different vantage points. By delineating the definition of metaphysics to the distinction between ‘what is known’ and ‘what is not known’, it is argued that the resulting ‘silo-effect’ of knowledge does not advance the discourse between science, theology and philosophy. This is especially true when religion raises the notion of ‘God-talk’. In order to create a common ground between science, theology and philosophy (specifically when it comes to God-talk), this article proposes another construct, namely ‘postmetaphysics’. It is argued that postmetaphysics assists in overcoming dualistic theological notions of God which hampers discussions between the mentioned conversation partners.

Is there a wall to peek over? Exploring approaches in the science and religion conversation

“…In a paper entitled 'How postmetaphysical can God-talk be?' (Bentley 2017), I alluded to the daring act of transcending boundaries between the natural sciences, religion and philosophy, specifically when it comes to God-talk. The article proposed that each discipline (science, philosophy and religion) could endorse and enrich their own perspectives, not by clinging frantically to their own vantage points, but by daring to be vulnerable and honestly engaging perspectives other than their own.…”