How Politics Deals with Expert Dissent: The Case of Ethics Councils

Abstract

Over recent years, science and technology have been reassessed increasingly in ethical terms. Particularly for life science governance, ethics has become the dominant discourse. In the course of this ‘‘ethical turn’’ national ethics councils were set up throughout Europe and in the United States to advice politics in ethically controversial issues such as stem cell research and genetic testing. Ethics experts have become subject to traditional warnings against expertocracy: they are suspected to unduly influence political decision-making. However, any reliable ethics expertise has to reflect societal disagreements in moral issues. Therefore, expert dissent is a normal feature of legitimate ethics expertise. Based on theoretical considerations we argue that in principle, expert dissent does not cause problems for political legitimacy; rather, it enhances the salience of politics: obviously decisions on ethical issues cannot be taken on the basis of expert knowledge alone. We therefore conclude that expert dissent, not consent, supports politics. Focussing on Germany and Austria, we show how politics deal with expert dissent in practice. While in Germany politics acknowledge dissent and use it to foster a fundamental political debate, Austrian politics attribute authoritative power to ethics expertise and try to construct an overall consensus. This illustrates how the drawing of boundaries between politic and expertise differs.

Co-Opted Biased Social Science: 64 Years of Telling Half Truths about the Kibbutz

“…Functionalist survey studies are bound to low moral biases as team seniors confined to academy's ivory towers tend to suppress the dissenting views of junior field workers who discern biases of research tools such as ignoring the low-moral practices of power elites. Remote as they are from the field, senior surveyors tend to miss, major phenomena but their views dominate; without sufficiently authoritative dissenting views research tends to, miss major social problems [18]. Worse still, while interpersonal trust helps monitor actors' ethics and morality [11], senior surveyors who avoid field-work may not create mutual trust with junior field workers who discern biases of survey tools, hence, biased research is probable.…”

“…At the same time, the social sciences have been paying increasing attention to researchers' ethics and morality [10]- [17]. While much literature deals with the scientists' ethics about individual interests less is devoted to moral caring for societal interests [18]- [20]. Such caring is consi-…”

From Ethical Exceptionalism to Ethical Exceptions: The Rule and exception Model and the Changing Meaning of Ethics In German Bioregulation

“…43 It is not even mandatory for the ZES or for the Ethics Committees on PGD to have a professional ethicist on board. What is 'the ethical' about these bodies?…”

Integrating Immigrants in Europe

“…While there are some isolated studies on the interrelation between migration researchers and Austrian politics and society, contemporary Austrian science studies are generally characterised by a focus on natural sciences, technology and innovation (Bogner and Menz 2010;Fassmann et al 2009;Münz 2011;Perchinig 2005Perchinig , 2010. According to Ulrike Felt (2000, interaction between science, politics and society in post-war Austria is generally shaped by the establishment of expert systems and advisory bodies, a multiplication of actors and topics in the public sphere, a mostly marginal position in Austrian decision-making for the public and an institutionalisation of science in politics.…”