2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3154431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Polarized are Citizens? Measuring Ideology from the Ground-Up

Abstract: The version presented here is a Working Paper (or 'pre-print') that may be later published elsewhere.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large literature in political science documents the rising polarization of Democrats and Republicans in Congress, and the discussions of political polarization is undoubtedly on the rise (Gentzkow 2016), but the literature to date has been far less conclusive on whether Republicans and Democrats in the US population overall have been growing apart. Most of the academic work has focused on differences in social attitudes captured in the GSS or the ANES, with some studies concluding that polarization is on the rise (e.g., Abramowitz and Saunders 2008;Draca and Schwarz 2018) and others rejecting this conclusion (e.g., Fiorina and Abrams 2008;Glaeser and Ward 2006). Much of the disagreement between these studies is ultimately driven by differences in how polarization is measured.…”
Section: Political Ideologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large literature in political science documents the rising polarization of Democrats and Republicans in Congress, and the discussions of political polarization is undoubtedly on the rise (Gentzkow 2016), but the literature to date has been far less conclusive on whether Republicans and Democrats in the US population overall have been growing apart. Most of the academic work has focused on differences in social attitudes captured in the GSS or the ANES, with some studies concluding that polarization is on the rise (e.g., Abramowitz and Saunders 2008;Draca and Schwarz 2018) and others rejecting this conclusion (e.g., Fiorina and Abrams 2008;Glaeser and Ward 2006). Much of the disagreement between these studies is ultimately driven by differences in how polarization is measured.…”
Section: Political Ideologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple research evidence (e.g. Draca and Schwarz, 2018;Boxell, Gentzkow, and Shapiro, 2020) indicates a more pronounced political divide in the US relative to other countries. Finally, we do not find that subjects who had a direct contact with Asians in the past perceive the extent of discrimination differently than those with no previous exposure (p=0.45).…”
Section: Prior Beliefs About the Extent Of Discrimination Against Asiansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our first eight studies, we provide a comprehensive series of tests concerning whether and how people perceive that society is changing over time, testing various facets of these beliefs, including general perceptions of change in society (Studies 1A through 1C), perceptions of change in the number of liberals and conservatives in society (Studies 2A and 2B), and participants' own perceptions of how the number of people who share their (liberal or conservative) values is changing (Studies 3A through 3C). In Study 4, we assess whether these effects extend beyond the American political context by conducting a conceptual replication in The Netherlands, a country with a multi-party political system and less political polarization than in the US (Adams, De Vries, & Leiter, 2012;Draca & Schwarz, 2020;Reiljan, 2019).…”
Section: The Present Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%