2018 Conference on Information Communications Technology and Society (ICTAS) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/ictas.2018.8368749
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How personality diversity influences team performance in student software engineering teams

Abstract: This publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act (Auteurswet) with explicit consent by the author. Dutch law entitles the maker of a short scientific work funded either wholly or partially by Dutch public funds to make that work publicly available for no consideration following a reasonable period of time after the work was first published, provided that clear reference is made to the source of the first publication of the work. This publication is distributed under Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now, from the pedagogical point of view, it is confirming that not considering criteria related to personality traits before the group formation has generally led to lower results. Taking into account personality traits in the group formation process enhances their collaborative performance when it comes to software development activities [78,[82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90]. In this aspect, the highlight of the study is that those groups whose formation has been pre-established by the teachers through the proposed strategy, in general, have had a better collaborative performance than groups with traditional formation, except in the case of heterogeneous training.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, from the pedagogical point of view, it is confirming that not considering criteria related to personality traits before the group formation has generally led to lower results. Taking into account personality traits in the group formation process enhances their collaborative performance when it comes to software development activities [78,[82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90]. In this aspect, the highlight of the study is that those groups whose formation has been pre-established by the teachers through the proposed strategy, in general, have had a better collaborative performance than groups with traditional formation, except in the case of heterogeneous training.…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, homogeneous grouping presents certain advantages for some types of learning activities, especially those that involve guided discovery, development of skills, review of material that has already been learned, or in highly structured tasks of competencies construction, allowing students to progress at a similar rate, which is beneficial for the achievement of specific goals [1][2][3][4]; this grouping type promotes a positive effect on collaborative learning [5][6][7]. Such is the case of activities that support learning processes in initial programming courses, the context of this study; where, also, considering the personality traits of students in the group formation process enhances their collaborative performance, when it comes to software development activities [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] This paper presents the results of the research process carried out to structure a homogeneous group formation technique in collaborative learning contexts, formation based on personality traits. For this, the "Big Five Inventory" is used as an instrument for measuring the traits of the participants' personality, a standardized inventory or questionnaire based on the psychological model of the Big Five [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%