DOI: 10.3990/1.9789036552257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How people trust their governments : Trends, patterns and determinants of trust differentiation in multilevel polities

Abstract: AcknowledgementsChapter 1 Introduction 1.1. Political trust, democracy and multilevel governance: introducing the research problem 1.2. Structure of this chapter 1.3. The concept of political trust 1.4. Trust and distrust in democratic governance 1.5. Research gaps: trust in government as generalized vs. specific evaluation 1.6. Shifting the focus to how people trust: political trust in multilevel governance 1.7. Research questions 1.7.1. Trends and patterns of trust differentiation: the need for exploratory d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 312 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The learning literature argues that learning processes at one level cannot simply be equated to the processes on others, and that learning may be biased and patchy (Van Assche et al 2022). The trust literature considers compensatory dynamics to be as likely as congruence dynamics (Proszowska 2021). Finally, the institutionalist literature argues that polities facing turbulence do not always mobilize multiple repertoires of responsesdecoupling talk and action insteadthereby deterring the failure of one component (talk) from reverberating across entire systems (e.g., Brunsson 1989).…”
Section: Systemic-level Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The learning literature argues that learning processes at one level cannot simply be equated to the processes on others, and that learning may be biased and patchy (Van Assche et al 2022). The trust literature considers compensatory dynamics to be as likely as congruence dynamics (Proszowska 2021). Finally, the institutionalist literature argues that polities facing turbulence do not always mobilize multiple repertoires of responsesdecoupling talk and action insteadthereby deterring the failure of one component (talk) from reverberating across entire systems (e.g., Brunsson 1989).…”
Section: Systemic-level Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%