Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3369457.3369460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Participatory Design Works

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…users throughout the product development process (Blomberg & Henderson, 1990). While PD and user-centered design both engage potential users in the design process, PD's mechanisms (e.g., collaborative reflection) distinguish it from other usercentered design methods (Hansen et al, 2019). In addition, PD is an evolving practice; further studies have been conducted involving persons with disabilities and older adults to understand improved accessibility design (Ghodke et al, 2019;Kanstrup et al, 2017;Nielsen et al, 2018).…”
Section: Autonomous Vehicles and Users With Disabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…users throughout the product development process (Blomberg & Henderson, 1990). While PD and user-centered design both engage potential users in the design process, PD's mechanisms (e.g., collaborative reflection) distinguish it from other usercentered design methods (Hansen et al, 2019). In addition, PD is an evolving practice; further studies have been conducted involving persons with disabilities and older adults to understand improved accessibility design (Ghodke et al, 2019;Kanstrup et al, 2017;Nielsen et al, 2018).…”
Section: Autonomous Vehicles and Users With Disabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The review focuses on generating insights on how multiple stakeholders can jointly explore the design space of their (playable) city. This analysis uses the structure proposed by Hansen et al (2019), who view participatory design processes through the lens of program theory. For each paper, the following elements are identified: which (co-)design and research activities were used during the research, which actors were included, what was their level of involvement [resonating with mechanisms from Hansen et al (2019)], and which type of effect the research evoked.…”
Section: Literature Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The types of effect are categorized as outputs, outcomes, and/or impact. Examples of effects that are categorized as output are design requirements or evaluation results; examples of outcomes are participants gaining new competence or identifying new ways of working; finally, an example of achieved impact is when long-term networks are created or the research results in democratic influence (Hansen et al, 2019). Papers were selected for the review based on the following three criteria: (1) the paper describes an intervention aiming to include citizen opinion; (2) one or multiple actors is involved in the design and/or evaluation of the intervention; (3) the paper describes enough detail of the design and/or evaluation process such that the activities, actors, level of involvement, and effects can be analyzed.…”
Section: Literature Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers and practitioners are keenly aware of the importance of analytically investigating how collective engagements can develop over time [11] while enabling the conditions for those engagements to exist, with an emphasis in the long-term. Indeed, it is at the core of Participatory Design to be concerned with particular mechanisms and effects that lead to sustainable change [6].…”
Section: Workhop Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%