How open innovation practices drive innovation performance: moderated-mediation in the interplay between overcoming syndromes and capabilities

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to investigate whether and under what conditions open innovation (OI) drives innovation performance (IP) in the financial sector. To this end, the paper first analyzes in-depth the indirect effect of overcoming two attitudinal mediators, namely, not-invented-here syndrome (NIHS) and not-sold-here syndrome (NSHS). It then uses dynamic capabilities theory to hypothesize that the indirect effects are moderated by absorptive and desorptive capabilities, respectively. Design/methodology/approach The authors perform an empirical study of major Spanish financial entities. Data are collected from 288 questionnaires from employees at branches of 13 bank entities. Regression analysis tests the mediating role of overcoming syndromes and the moderated-mediating role of dynamic capabilities in the OI–IP relationship. Findings Results confirm the indirect effect of overcoming NIHS on the relationship between outside-in OI and IP, and the indirect effect of overcoming NSHS on the relationship between inside-out OI and IP. Further, absorptive capacity moderates the indirect effect between outside-in OI practices and IP by overcoming NIHS, and desorptive capacity moderates the indirect effect between inside-out OI practices and IP by overcoming NSHS. Originality/value This paper advances knowledge by explaining discrepancies in the sign of the OI–IP relationship. By introducing comprehensive absorptive and desorptive capacity models to explain OI, it advocates an integrative framework to understand OI activities and their outcomes. Managers should develop these capacities using human talent training and cultural values development to mitigate NIHS and NSHS and optimize firms’ OI efforts and the improved IP benefits derived from them.

Empowering Clusters: How Dynamic Capabilities Drive Sustainable Supply Chain Clusters in Egypt

“…Since organisations' capabilities can be enhanced through the integration of resources among the system's members [29], and the shared infrastructure provided through clustering allows organisations to adapt quickly to market shocks [43], it can be argued that SCCDCs can be used to enhance resilience, and especially that strong partnerships can increase resilience [44]. Organisations in a SCC can exploit external knowledge by hiring skilled labour and acquiring information and knowledge from the pool created by SC-CDC [25], which enhances creativity and innovation [45,46]. Since AC can be enhanced through the facilitation of sharing knowledge and information [47] and access to new skills and resources [48], it can be argued that SCCDCs can pave the way for organisations to develop their AC.…”

The Limits of Open Innovation: A Literature Review and Research Agenda

“…Second, the firm's shifting the allocation of their resources may face different challenges from managing innovation performance to meeting market demand [40]. These risks can be decreased with proper planning and coordination but exist, nevertheless [27], [41], [56]. Third, the scope of OI implementation would limit the success of OI [47], [57].…”