2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How object, situation and personality shape human attitude in learning: An activity perspective and a multilevel modeling approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They rather suggest that engagement recognition in infancy might be considered from a more perceptual than conceptual perspective. Contexts and structural frameworks in which experiences take place are known to shape persons' attention and attitudes toward what they perceive (Barwise & Perry, ; Fantasia et al., ; Streitfeld & Wilson, ; Sun, ). Therefore, familiar conditions may help to allocate attention toward the signals relevant to engagement and the incoming collaborative activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They rather suggest that engagement recognition in infancy might be considered from a more perceptual than conceptual perspective. Contexts and structural frameworks in which experiences take place are known to shape persons' attention and attitudes toward what they perceive (Barwise & Perry, ; Fantasia et al., ; Streitfeld & Wilson, ; Sun, ). Therefore, familiar conditions may help to allocate attention toward the signals relevant to engagement and the incoming collaborative activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An individual's attitude determines his/her type of response to difficult situations. For the most part, attitude is shaped by one's object, situation and personality (Sun, 2009;Maio and Haddock, 2010), but can be changed throughout one's lifetime. A strong will and positive attitude have been found to improve technology usability (Bhattacherjee and Premkumar, 2004).…”
Section: Motivationalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It refers to the "psychological tendency that is expressed by evaluating a particular entity with some degree of favour or disfavour" (Eagle and Chaiken, 1993, p.1). Conceptually, attitudes can be divided into general and specific attitudes (Sun and Wilson, 2008). A specific attitude is a strong predictor of a single behaviour on a particular attitude object; while a general attitude explains the general tendency to engage in relevant behaviour of a category of attitude object (Ajzen and Fishbein, 1977;Hines, Hungerford and Tomera, 1986-87;Eagle and Chaiken, 1993).…”
Section: Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A specific attitude is a strong predictor of a single behaviour on a particular attitude object; while a general attitude explains the general tendency to engage in relevant behaviour of a category of attitude object (Ajzen and Fishbein, 1977;Hines, Hungerford and Tomera, 1986-87;Eagle and Chaiken, 1993). Sun and Wilson (2008) argued that both types of attitude should be studied together in an empirical research, as the formation of specific attitude toward a new object is likely to be influenced by the general attitudes as well. Besides, a more complete understanding of attitude can be derived from considering and clarifying both type of attitudes in one study (Eagly and Chaiken, 1998).…”
Section: Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%