2022
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4097698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How (Not) to Purchase Novel Goods and Services: Specific Performance Versus At-Will Contracts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 67 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One way to interpret our main findings is that in such situations, it may be in the principal's interest to voluntarily choose a limited commitment contract (by not committing to a future price) as a way to overcome her incentive problem. 6 Perhaps the closest paper to ours in terms of application is Schmitz (2022), which studies a similar bilateral trade problem, where a buyer wants to procure a novel object, but the seller's costs are only revealed with delay. He shows that an at-will contract, which allows the seller to walk away if the costs turn out to be too high, may generate more social surplus than a specific-performance contract, which requires the seller to deliver an object no matter the costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to interpret our main findings is that in such situations, it may be in the principal's interest to voluntarily choose a limited commitment contract (by not committing to a future price) as a way to overcome her incentive problem. 6 Perhaps the closest paper to ours in terms of application is Schmitz (2022), which studies a similar bilateral trade problem, where a buyer wants to procure a novel object, but the seller's costs are only revealed with delay. He shows that an at-will contract, which allows the seller to walk away if the costs turn out to be too high, may generate more social surplus than a specific-performance contract, which requires the seller to deliver an object no matter the costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%