2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2018.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How much separation for LC–MS/MS quantitative bioanalysis of drugs and metabolites?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors have identified polyphenols in cladodes through HPLC and UHPLC because they maximize polyphenol identification accuracy (Tan & Fanaras, 2018). Hence, these techniques lead the separation methods for polyphenols analysis (Table 3).…”
Section: Identification Of Polyphenolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have identified polyphenols in cladodes through HPLC and UHPLC because they maximize polyphenol identification accuracy (Tan & Fanaras, 2018). Hence, these techniques lead the separation methods for polyphenols analysis (Table 3).…”
Section: Identification Of Polyphenolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elution of interfering compounds or matrix effect (ion suppression or enhancement) can be greatly affected by the pH of mobile phases (Chambers, Wagrowski‐Diehl, Lu, & Mazzeo, ; Rainville et al, ; Ruta et al, ; Tan & Fanaras, ). Hence, the interfering compounds and matrix effect pattern by using a basic mobile phase could be completely different from those of acidic mobile phases.…”
Section: Benefits Of Using High‐ph Mobile Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, as mentioned earlier, the interference compounds or matrix effect compounds are mobile phase specific (Tan & Fanaras, ). Sometimes it can be very challenging to separate a matrix effect or interfering peak from the compounds of interest with a basic mobile phase.…”
Section: Cautions For Using High‐ph Mobile Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection in HPLC includes UV–vis absorption, fluorescence, refractive index, chemiluminescence, various types of electrochemical detection, evaporative light‐scattering, etc., offering a wide range of possibilities for measuring the analytes or their derivatives. HPLC coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) brings analytical advantages for selectivity and sensitivity (Borden et al, 2020), although the literature also debates some limitations (Medvedovici, Albu, & David, 2010) or the magnitude of separation required for LC–MS quantitative bioanalysis of drugs and metabolites (Tan & Fanaras, 2018). Currently, the most extensively utilized LC–MS interfaces are based on atmospheric pressure ionization strategies, such as electrospray ionization (ESI), atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) and atmospheric pressure photo‐ionization (APPI) (Sabourian et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…quantitative bioanalysis of drugs and metabolites (Tan & Fanaras, 2018). Currently, the most extensively utilized LC-MS interfaces are based on atmospheric pressure ionization strategies, such as electrospray ionization (ESI), atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) and atmospheric pressure photo-ionization (APPI) (Sabourian et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%