2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2016.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How much is enough? An investigation of nonprofessional investors information search and stopping rule use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have tried to interpret what is "enough" by users through understanding what stopping rules people use to terminate their search behaviors. Some studies have pointed out that "enough" means satisficing information needs (Prabha, Silipigni Connaway, Olszewski, & Jenkins, 2007) and user characteristics are related to the stopping rule one may use (Pennington & Kelton, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have tried to interpret what is "enough" by users through understanding what stopping rules people use to terminate their search behaviors. Some studies have pointed out that "enough" means satisficing information needs (Prabha, Silipigni Connaway, Olszewski, & Jenkins, 2007) and user characteristics are related to the stopping rule one may use (Pennington & Kelton, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical evidence on which information sources non-professional investors use is scant (Pennington and Kelton 2016). Nevertheless, existing research suggests that although many non-professional investors use filtered information provided by professional intermediaries, some use unfiltered information disclosed by company management, such as 10-Ks (Hodge and Pronk 2006, Elliott et al 2008, Pennington and Kelton 2016. Importantly, financial regulators consider such investors in regulating financial disclosures (Elliott et al 2011, Financial Reporting Council 2017.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is not always part of the mix" (p. 60). Nevertheless, Pennington and Kelton (2016) do not address the theoretical prediction from Attribution Theory (Kelley, 1967;Plous, 1993): individuals may use accounting information as a 'baseline' (dispositional attribute, as this type of information has a less 'timely' disclosure when compared to other information sources), and not retrieve it when they are asked directly to do so. Other situational attributes (such as news media or past market events), stimulates memory retrieval in detriment of accounting/financial information by being more salient and available to users in a day-today basis.…”
Section: Research Contributionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As Pennington and Kelton (2016) have indicated, we argue that following interviewees' stopping rules through their speech, by directly questioning how s/he acquires information, and how this search process happens may allow us to build a more robust understanding about the choice of informational sources (mainly accounting ones) and to investigate if accounting information overload can exert an influence over individuals when they choose information from accounting/non-accounting sources.…”
Section: Concourse Q-samples and The 'Condition Of Instruction': Conmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation