2020
DOI: 10.26686/wgtn.12543437
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How much input do you need to learn the most frequent 9,000 words?

Abstract: This study looks at how much input is needed to gain enough repetition of the 1st 9,000 words of English for learning to occur. It uses corpora of various sizes and composition to see how many tokens of input would be needed to gain at least twelve repetitions and to meet most of the words at eight of the nine 1000 word family levels. Corpus sizes of just under 200,000 tokens and 3 million tokens provide an average of at least 12 repetitions at the 2nd 1,000 word level and the 9th 1,000 word level respectively… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
1
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
50
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…On the second research of the relationship between the GEPT gains and the reading frequency, unfortunately, no significant correlation was observed. Based on the tremendous advancement of recent research on vocabulary and reading amounts, especially the work of Nation [6], the importance of frequent reading was truly revealed. He provided convincing empirical data on how extensive a learner needs to read to acquire the first 9 th 1,000 word families (98% coverage of running words in a variety of texts), in both total number of words and time length for reading every day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the second research of the relationship between the GEPT gains and the reading frequency, unfortunately, no significant correlation was observed. Based on the tremendous advancement of recent research on vocabulary and reading amounts, especially the work of Nation [6], the importance of frequent reading was truly revealed. He provided convincing empirical data on how extensive a learner needs to read to acquire the first 9 th 1,000 word families (98% coverage of running words in a variety of texts), in both total number of words and time length for reading every day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, students at higher levels need to learn the words at mid to low frequency levels. These words occur less frequently in reading texts; as a result, readers will have to read more to create enough exposure opportunities to meet the words [6,8]. Nonetheless, research also suggests that the reading speed slows down when readers read difficult texts because they need more time to process [31], which may suggest why depending on the total words of reading is not the best indicator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Still, our finding that free reading is superior to direct instruction for word acquisition is consistent with analyses that used a very different approach to the problem, that of corpus analysis. Nation (2014), for example, looked at a large corpus of classic novels to determine how much one would have to read to have a reasonable chance of acquiring new words. Potentially unknown words that occurred 12 or more times in the text were considered "acquired" in Nation's study.…”
Section: Some Objectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incidental learning results in learning small numbers of strongly known words and reasonable numbers of words at various strengths of knowledge (Pellicer-Sánchez & Schmitt, 2010;Pigada & Schmitt, 2006;Waring & Takaki, 2003). Repetition has a strong effect on learning from reading, and the small amounts of strongly known words learned can become large amounts with substantial quantities of reading (Nagy, Herman & Anderson, 1985;Nation, 2014a). Adding a deliberate element to the learning greatly increases learning (Fraser, 1999;Mondria, 2003;Paribakht & Wesche, 1993;Sonbul & Schmitt, 2009), with vocabulary exercises having a stronger effect than dictionary look-up (Laufer & Rozovski-Roitblatt, 2011).…”
Section: Vocabulary Learning From Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%