How much improvement can satisfy patients? Exploring patients’ satisfaction 3 years after total knee arthroplasty

Abstract

Background Despite the innovations in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is still a subset of patients who do not acquire significant relief or expected satisfaction after primary TKA. However, this subgroup of patients still gains improvements more or less in terms of objective or quantified assessments after the procedure. The purpose of our study is to explore the factors that correlate with patients’ satisfaction and identify minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and minimum important change (MIC) in clinical parameters. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of 161 patients diagnosed with osteoarthritis who underwent unilateral total knee arthroplasty from January 2017 to December 2017. We collected the following parameters: body mass index (BMI), duration of disease, education level, depression state, preoperative flexion contracture angle of knee, HSS scores, 11-point NRS scores, and radiological parameters (preoperative minimal joint space width and varus angle of knee). The satisfaction was graded by self-reported scores in percentage (0–100). Results We revealed that 80.8% of patients were satisfied 3 years overall after primary TKA. HSS score change, NRS-Walking score change, age, and pre-mJSW showed significant difference between satisfied and dissatisfied group. The varus angle change revealed statistical significance according to the levels of satisfaction. Simple linear regression identified the MCID for HSS score to be 5.41 and for the NRS-Walking to be 1.24. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve identified the MIC for HSS score to be 25.5 and for the NRS-Walking score to be 6.5. Conclusions In summary, we identified several factors that correlated with patients’ satisfaction independently after TKA in a long term. In addition, we revealed the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and minimum important change (MIC) for HSS and NRS score in these patients.

Patella scores are similar both with gap balancing and measured resection after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized single‐centre study

“…Therefore, the study hypothesis was rejected. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is an important issue and some scoring systems have been evaluated for patient satisfaction [12]. In the current study, the FCs were found to be more externally rotated and the PCO ratio was higher in the GB group than in the MR group in the TKAs.…”

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves implant position and early functional recovery for the knee with severe varus/valgus deformity

“…Ranawat’s classification was used to assess valgus deformity and Thienpont’s classification was used to evaluate the varus deformity of the knee joint [ 15 , 16 ]. The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) used for the HSS was 5.41 [ 17 ].…”

Comparison of Survival Rate between Posterior-Stabilized and Constrained Condylar Articulations in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up Analysis

“…For each measurement, the result was recorded in the outpatient medical record. Patients were considered to have attained the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) when their improvement in scores were greater than 5.4 for HSS, 15) 6.1 for KSS function, 16) and 17.0 for WOMAC. 17 18) The American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system was used to assess the fitness of patients by anesthesiologists in the hospital for the prediction of anesthetic and surgical risks prior to the procedure.…”