2022
DOI: 10.3390/en15041380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Much Energy Do We Need to Fly with Greater Agility? Energy Consumption and Performance of an Attitude Stabilization Controller in a Quadcopter Drone: A Modified MPC vs. PID

Abstract: Increasing demand for faster and more agile Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs, drones) is observed in many scenarios, including but not limited to medical supply or Search-and-Rescue (SAR) missions. Exceptional maneuverability is critical for robust obstacle avoidance during autonomous flights. A novel modification to the Model Predictive Controller (MPC) is proposed, which drastically improves the speed of the attitude controller of our quadcopter drone. The modified MPC is suitable for the onboard microcontroll… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The acceptable THD value for generators is below 25%, while the best THD value for generators is below 10%. Based on Table 5 and according to [24], the THD value for both states are considered acceptable which is below 25% for the MPC. This proves that the generators are working efficiently when in a 20 kHz sampling rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The acceptable THD value for generators is below 25%, while the best THD value for generators is below 10%. Based on Table 5 and according to [24], the THD value for both states are considered acceptable which is below 25% for the MPC. This proves that the generators are working efficiently when in a 20 kHz sampling rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the most used controller is the MPC. [23] states that the MPC has a better performance than the PID in terms of vehicle control and the enhanced MPC has the fastest response in the drone's movement control [24]. Besides, [25] remarks that the MPC is more robust and stable because of its complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy efficiency of a drone was discussed e.g. in 16 , which presented a detailed study of the relationship between energy costs and the stabilisation of the altitude and the flight speed, which were characteristic of flight in formation, but again without considering the impact of collision avoidance.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the original diagram mentions a Feed-Forward (FF) component, it was eventually disabled in our build of the ArduCopter software. We investigated the overall agility of the attitude controller and eventually implemented a novel variant of the Model Predictive Controller (MPC) [44,45] as described in [46]. The control law of the attitude PID controller (see Figure 23) is simple enough that the embedded microcontroller can compute it efficiently in the main control loop at 400 Hz.…”
Section: Flight Controller Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of initial tests was performed in a custom-made limited-freedom test harness, which allows tilting the drone in a single axis only while holding it firmly and locking the remaining axes of rotation (Figure 24). Such a safe test environment was facilitative when we worked on the model identification and implementation of the attitude controllers [42,46]. The final Elka1Q mode was tested in this environment as well.…”
Section: Experiments With Limited Flight Freedommentioning
confidence: 99%