How Much Does the DMFT Index Underestimate the Need for Restorative Care?

Abstract

The DMFT index, which represents caries experience as recommended by the World Health Organization (clinical examination without radiographs), was compared with a modified DMFT index with radiographs. The purpose was to evaluate how much the DMFT index underestimates the need for restorative care. A cohort of 376 young adults (eighteen to twenty years old) was examined from March 2003 to December 2004. Dental screening was based on clinical examination and bilateral bitewing radiographs. DMFT index was calculated with and without radiographs to compare DMFT scores. The average DMFT was 1.42 higher with radiographs than without (6.35 vs. 4.93, respectively), and the D component was 1.75 higher. The Pearson correlation between DMFT indices was 0.899 (p<0.0001) and 0.759 between the D components (p<0.0001). A correlation was found between D with radiographs and smoking more than ten cigarettes per day (p=0.0069). Without radiographs, there is a 44 percent probability that the caries decay value will be lower than the actual value, thus causing a greater possibility of diagnostic errors. The findings indicate that assessing treatment needs for a population based only on DMFT screening is inadequate and incomplete without radiographs.Dr. Becker is Head of the Dental Clinic, Israeli Defense Forces and a member

Oral health status of 12-year-old school children in Khartoum state, the Sudan; a school-based survey

“…Conversely, it may have been underestimated in the field due to the use of natural sunlight for examination [ 20 ] and that questionable cases were recorded as negative for caries. A condition that applies to all studies using the DMFT tool is that the WHO criteria for dental caries diagnosis tend to underestimate the need for treatment by overlooking small and proximal cavities [ 21 ]. Over and above the before acknowledged limitations of the DMFT index, the caries diagnosis methodology in the previously conducted studies was not clear enough to make an absolute comparison.…”

Associations between school deprivation indices and oral health status

“…On the other hand, the DMF‐S is the most widely used indicator for dental caries experience in oral epidemiology studies and prior DMF‐S is also considered as an important predictor of dental caries risk (27). Despite some debate (28, 29), the DMF‐S remains recommended by the World Health Organization for measuring dental caries experience (1).…”

Respiratory pathogen colonization of dental plaque, the lower airways, and endotracheal tube biofilms during mechanical ventilation

“…The DMFT score was recorded (by a dental professional). The DMFT score is a measurement of dental caries status and is therefore an indicator of prior longer-term oral hygiene levels [31]. Each incidence of a tooth recorded as decayed, missing or filled results in a score of 1 to generate a score of 0-28, with higher scores representing poor oral health.…”