2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How much does surface polymorphism influence the work function of organic/metal interfaces?

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This interface system is ideal for our study because its surface chemistry (in the absence of electric elds) is fairly well characterized, both experimentally [40][41][42] and through simulations. [42][43][44][45] Different polymorphs of TCNE on Cu(111) have been shown to exhibit substantially different properties such as the work function, which varies by up to 3 eV between polymorphs. 45 TCNE is known to bond to the surface through a Blyholder-like interaction, 46 comprising charge-donation from the metal into the molecular LUMO and back-donation from the molecular s-system to the surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This interface system is ideal for our study because its surface chemistry (in the absence of electric elds) is fairly well characterized, both experimentally [40][41][42] and through simulations. [42][43][44][45] Different polymorphs of TCNE on Cu(111) have been shown to exhibit substantially different properties such as the work function, which varies by up to 3 eV between polymorphs. 45 TCNE is known to bond to the surface through a Blyholder-like interaction, 46 comprising charge-donation from the metal into the molecular LUMO and back-donation from the molecular s-system to the surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[42][43][44][45] Different polymorphs of TCNE on Cu(111) have been shown to exhibit substantially different properties such as the work function, which varies by up to 3 eV between polymorphs. 45 TCNE is known to bond to the surface through a Blyholder-like interaction, 46 comprising charge-donation from the metal into the molecular LUMO and back-donation from the molecular s-system to the surface. 43 Importantly, the resulting molecule-substrate interaction is strongly different for different adsorption geometries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…68,[70][71][72]74 Conversely, the vibrations of the molecules on the substrate can differ substantially from the molecules in the gas phase, especially when charge-transfer at the interface occurs. 73 For the special case of TCNE/Cu(111), it was shown in previous work 43,44 the zero-point energy of the adsorption geometries differs only very little when there is no field applied.…”
Section: Temperature and Pressure Dependence: Electric Fields As Hand...mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This interface system is ideal for our study because its surface chemistry is fairly well characterized (in absence of electric fields), both experimentally 39-41 and through simulations. [41][42][43][44] Different polymorphs of TCNE on Cu(111) have been shown to exhibit substantially different properties such as the work function, which varies by up to 3 eV between polymorphs. 44 TCNE is known to bond to the surface through a Blyholder-like interaction, 45 comprising charge-donation from the metal into the molecular LUMO and back-donation from the molecular system to the surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation