How Much Does Social Status Matter to Longevity?—Evidence from China's Academician Election

Abstract

We provide evidence for the causal impact of social status on longevity by exploiting a natural experiment in which subjects undergo a shift in their social status without considerable economic impact. We gather data on 4190 scientists who were either nominated for or successfully elected to the Chinese Academy of Science or of Engineering. Being elected as an academician in China is a boost in social status (vice-ministerial level) with negligible direct economic impact (US$30 monthly before 2009). After correcting for two sources of bias, (1) some potential academicians decease too young to be elected, leading to selection bias in favor of academicians and (2) the endogenous relationship between health and social status, we find that the enhanced social status of becoming an academician leads to approximately 1.2 years longer life. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Status does not predict stress: Women in an egalitarian hunter–gatherer society

“…Human status can also be based on prestige, or freely conferred deference from others (Henrich & Gil-White, 2001 ; Cheng & Tracey, 2013 ). Studies in WEIRD (Western, educated, industrialized, rich and democratic) societies (Henrich et al, 2010 ) have shown that individuals with higher social status based on prestige, rather than money, live longer than economically equal peers without prestige (Liu et al, 2017 ; Redelmeier & Singh, 2001 ).…”

Longevity returns to political office

“…Rablen and Oswald (2008), for example, compare scientists who won the Nobel prize in Chemistry and Physics to scientists who were nominated, finding a causal effect of winning a Nobel prize on longevity. Liu et al (2017) estimate the effect among scientists of being elected to the Chinese Academy of Science and Engineering and find that becoming an academician increases longevity with approximately 1.2 years.…”

Mendelian randomization study supports the causal effects of air pollution on longevity via multiple age-related diseases

“…However, the plethora of confounding factors affecting life expectancy makes it difficult to make causal inferences 9 . For instance, socioeconomic factors, such as socioeconomic status (SES), educational attainment, income, and occupation, play a significant role as confounding variables in longevity studies 10 – 12 . SES can have a substantial impact on various aspects of individuals’ lives, including access to healthcare, living conditions, lifestyle choices, and exposure to environmental hazards, all of which can influence longevity outcomes 13 .…”