2022
DOI: 10.1007/s40858-021-00479-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How much do standard area diagrams improve accuracy of visual estimates of the percentage area diseased? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It provides a comprehensive assessment of the agreement by measuring both the correlation and the bias between the predicted and real values. Therefore, the ccc has been widely recommended and utilized in studies that involve comparing estimated severity values with actual severity values in phytopathometry [ 25 ][ 87 ][ 88 ]. This parameter was calculated using a resampling approach between predicted and visual values for each parameter using the R package “ yardstick ” [ 89 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It provides a comprehensive assessment of the agreement by measuring both the correlation and the bias between the predicted and real values. Therefore, the ccc has been widely recommended and utilized in studies that involve comparing estimated severity values with actual severity values in phytopathometry [ 25 ][ 87 ][ 88 ]. This parameter was calculated using a resampling approach between predicted and visual values for each parameter using the R package “ yardstick ” [ 89 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite being widely used, visual DS estimations can be imprecise and biased for diseases with small and numerous lesions like rust [ 25 ]. Therefore, researchers usually also analyse IF and/or PS that are less prone to user bias to quantify more precisely partial resistance in pea [ 71 ].…”
Section: Processing Time Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For GLS, the intensity of the disease can be expressed by determining the severity, that is, by the proportion or percentage of diseased tissue in relation to the total tissue (Madden et al, 2007). As a strategy for quantifying diseases in this way, standard area diagram sets (SADs) stand out, helping to minimize errors during estimates by providing illustrated representations of the possible severity levels of the disease (Del Ponte et al, 2017Ponte et al, , 2022. However, a SADs for the foliar assessment of grey leaf spot in corn pathology has not yet been developed, validated and used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%