2000
DOI: 10.1177/no_doi
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Much Change?: An Analysis of the Initial Impact of Proportional Representation on the New Zealand Parliamentary Party System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This leads us to expect that parties will be distributed across the entire ideological spectrum rather than just at the extremes as the directional model would predict. In the New Zealand case, Barker and McLeay (2000) observe that the larger number of parties under PR meant that more voters' preferences were reflected in the policy process than under FPP, when one party was the sole significant source of policy.…”
Section: Party Systems Electoral Rules and Voting Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This leads us to expect that parties will be distributed across the entire ideological spectrum rather than just at the extremes as the directional model would predict. In the New Zealand case, Barker and McLeay (2000) observe that the larger number of parties under PR meant that more voters' preferences were reflected in the policy process than under FPP, when one party was the sole significant source of policy.…”
Section: Party Systems Electoral Rules and Voting Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Because such changes in stable democracies are rare, New Zealand's transition has prompted a great deal of scholarly interest. Recent studies have examined changes to the party system and parliamentary cohesion (Barker and McLeay, 2000), candidate selection (Gallagher, 1998), impact on political attitudes , voting behaviour (Karp et al, forthcoming), political participation and opinion about the electoral system (Karp and Bowler, 2001;Vowles, 2000). Despite the burgeoning field, there are no empirical studies on how the change in electoral system has altered the relationship between elites and voters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After all, it is less than seven years since the first MMP election, and there has been only one major change in the ideological orientation of the government during this period. Against this, almost 10 years have elapsed since the binding referendum in favour of MMP in late 1993, and in political terms it was this event rather than the first PR election three years later that marked the birth of the MMP era (Barker and McLeay 2000;Boston et al 1996a;Vowles et al 2002:3-5). Hence, it is certainly not too early to begin the task of evaluating the institutional, behavioural and policy impact of the new electoral arrangements.…”
Section: Jonathan Bostonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both instances, New Zealand (which is classified as an evolving system by Golosov) is treated as a two-party system owing to the important continuities even after the change to PR and the fact that during the observation period the system was divided rather clearly in two blocks led by the National Party and the Labour Party (seeBarker and McLeay, 2000).11 The selection of 20 OECD countries is justified by the theoretical framework, which draws on explanations of law and order policies in advanced industrialized countries. The time span from 1995 to 2008 is owing to data availability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%