2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c00145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Micro-/Nanostructure Evolution Influences Dynamic Wetting and Natural Deicing Abilities of Bionic Lotus Surfaces

Abstract: Anti-icing materials have become increasingly urgent for many fields such as power transmission, aviation, energy, telecommunications, and so on. Bionic lotus hydrophobic surfaces with hierarchical micro-/nanostructures show good potential of delaying ice formation; however, their icephobicity (deicing ability) has been controversial. It is mainly attributed to lack of deep understanding of the correlation between micro-/nanoscale structures, wettability, and icephobicity, as well as effective methods for eval… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reduction of ice accumulation is highly crucial, and ice adhesion force is one of the critical parameters. If ice adhesion is weak enough and the externally applied shear forces can separate the ice from the interface, deicing or anti-icing can be easily achieved. , Over the past several decades, sustainable solutions for anti/deicing has been extensively investigated, which can be grouped into two categories, that is, active and passive. Active anti/deicing methods disrupt the ice–structure interface in order to achieve deicing effects, using methods such as resistance heating, hot air, radiation, deicing fluids, electro-impulsive/expulsive, and ultrasonic techniques. These methods often require significant energy or chemical consumption, along with complex systems with low efficiencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduction of ice accumulation is highly crucial, and ice adhesion force is one of the critical parameters. If ice adhesion is weak enough and the externally applied shear forces can separate the ice from the interface, deicing or anti-icing can be easily achieved. , Over the past several decades, sustainable solutions for anti/deicing has been extensively investigated, which can be grouped into two categories, that is, active and passive. Active anti/deicing methods disrupt the ice–structure interface in order to achieve deicing effects, using methods such as resistance heating, hot air, radiation, deicing fluids, electro-impulsive/expulsive, and ultrasonic techniques. These methods often require significant energy or chemical consumption, along with complex systems with low efficiencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further explain the roll off behavior of the freezing droplet on the ST@CA/CC surface, we perform a force analysis, as shown in Figure b. Based on an existing study, we assume that the freezing droplet on inclined surfaces is only affected by gravity and adhesion. The adhesion force is expressed as follows: where F water is the adhesion force of the water–solid interface and F ice is the adhesion force of the ice–solid interface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microscale and nanoscale textures can form a hierarchically rough structure, a substantial contributor to the hydrophobicity of a surface. The wettability can be changed by the microscale or nanoscale texture [37,38]. The innate defects of a surface and the textures influence the surface roughness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%