2015
DOI: 10.1177/1077699015573269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Media Scholars’ Attributes Affect Their Ratings of Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly

Abstract: This article examines how media scholars' attributes affect ratings of Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly (JMCQ), based on the 2014 JMCQ readership survey.It compares the impacts of these attributes on five different types of subjective journal ratings. For instance, importance of journal impact factor in the respondent's institution only affects the rating of the journal's standing in the field. Attributes such as use and knowledge of the journal, research recognition received in the field, doctoral … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sole emphasis of citations as a measure of scholarly impact has been challenged by other scholars who argue for additional measures such as expert ratings to be taken into account (e.g. Ha et al ., ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The sole emphasis of citations as a measure of scholarly impact has been challenged by other scholars who argue for additional measures such as expert ratings to be taken into account (e.g. Ha et al ., ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Many African scholars also send manuscripts to journals without being familiar with such journals and most times without having read a single article published in the journals. “Familiarity with the journals consists of three dimensions: knowledge, use and readership” (Ha et al, 2015, p. 225). African scholars, in their haste to get published, most times gloss over such basic requirements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toward this end, the aim of the collection is to generate interest in African research and also to encourage more research output from scholars of the continent. “Research reputation,” according to (Ha et al, 2015), “is the most important criterion in evaluating a faculty’s performance in research in tenure and promotion decision in universities” (p. 221). Reputation is often linked to publication in prestigious journals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%