How Many Turns Make a Revolution? Whither the ‘Dialogue of the Deaf’ Between Peacebuilding Scholars and Practitioners

Hunt, Charles T.

doi:10.1080/17502977.2023.2197446

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 99 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Over the past decade, scholars have repeatedly and with increasing urgency raised the question of how to respond to the challenges posed by the failures of the liberal peace intervention model. This critique is fully aware of the fact that any suggestion for alternatives risks becoming prescriptive, reductive, or 'yet another "hegemonic agenda"' (Hunt, 2023;Richmond, 2009: 573;Richmond and Mac Ginty, 2015). The contributions in this Special Issue show that there is potential for the development of an emotions agenda for peace.…”

Section: Conclusion: An Emotions Agenda For Peacementioning

confidence: 99%

An emotions agenda for peace: Connections beyond feelings, power beyond violence

Travouillon¹,

Lemay‐Hébert²,

Wallis³

2023

Cooperation and Conflict

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While the ‘emotion turn’ has emerged as an influential analytical lens in International Relations (IR), there is not yet a well-developed understanding of the role that emotions play in facilitating or inhibiting peace. This special issue of Cooperation and Conflict engages with the analytical potential of emotions and the promise this perspective holds for innovative analyses of peace processes and peacebuilding. To demonstrate the political significance of emotions to peace, the contributors explore how emotions shape the bounds and boundaries of actors and alliances committed to fostering peaceful societies. This introductory article offers possible avenues to leverage the analytical potential of IR’s emotions agenda to engage with peace and peacebuilding. First, we discuss how the emotions agenda contributes to the conversation about what peace is and should look like. Second, we argue that emotions can help us to articulate peace as an embodied knowledge of complex socio-political relations and power dynamics. To visualize ‘peace’ without the permanent contrast of violence, we mobilize this perspective to illuminate actors’ practices and the constraints they face in the pursuit of a peaceful political order. Third, we discuss what an emotions agenda for peace might entail for critical and constructive peacebuilding studies.

show abstract

Section: Conclusion: An Emotions Agenda For Peacementioning

confidence: 99%

An emotions agenda for peace: Connections beyond feelings, power beyond violence

Travouillon¹,

Lemay‐Hébert²,

Wallis³

2023

Cooperation and Conflict

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The Resolution of Civil Wars: Changing International Norms of Peace-Making and the Academic Consensus

Piccolino

2023

Civil Wars

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Not the ‘Fairest Norm of Them All’ but Still Needed: On Hobson and Criticism of the Responsibility to Protect

Illingworth

2024

Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How Many Turns Make a Revolution? Whither the ‘Dialogue of the Deaf’ Between Peacebuilding Scholars and Practitioners

Cited by 5 publications

References 99 publications

An emotions agenda for peace: Connections beyond feelings, power beyond violence

An emotions agenda for peace: Connections beyond feelings, power beyond violence

The Resolution of Civil Wars: Changing International Norms of Peace-Making and the Academic Consensus

Not the ‘Fairest Norm of Them All’ but Still Needed: On Hobson and Criticism of the Responsibility to Protect

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About