2011
DOI: 10.7577/rerm.173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“How many sums can I do”? Performative strategies and diffractive thinking as methodological tools for rethinking mathematical subjectivity

Abstract: The aim of this article is to illustrate how the understanding of mathematical subjectivity changes when transiting theoretically and methodologically from a discursive and performative thinking, as suggested by Judith Butler (1990Butler ( , 1993Butler ( , 1997, to an agential realist and diffractive thinking, inspired by Karen Barad's theories (2007, 2008

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Foucault's (1979Foucault's ( , 1984 discursive genealogies also offer radical re-evaluations of modern institutional space and have informed studies on educational architecture (Burke and Grosvenor 2008), teachers' discursive practices within classroom and staffroom space (McGregor 2001), as well as feminist studies of space (Dunne 2007;Quinn 2003;Tamboukou 1999). However, the 'spatial turn' has usefully refocused attention on micro-level spatial practices, and brought theories of space into productive relation with studies of pedagogy and materialities (Fenwick and Landri 2012;Ivinson 2012;Mulcahy 2012;Palmer 2011;Zembylas 2007). Studies such as these lend support to my argument for understanding space as a material 'multiplicity' (Massey 2005, 9).…”
Section: Theoretical Contexts: Space Objects Bodies and Materialitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Foucault's (1979Foucault's ( , 1984 discursive genealogies also offer radical re-evaluations of modern institutional space and have informed studies on educational architecture (Burke and Grosvenor 2008), teachers' discursive practices within classroom and staffroom space (McGregor 2001), as well as feminist studies of space (Dunne 2007;Quinn 2003;Tamboukou 1999). However, the 'spatial turn' has usefully refocused attention on micro-level spatial practices, and brought theories of space into productive relation with studies of pedagogy and materialities (Fenwick and Landri 2012;Ivinson 2012;Mulcahy 2012;Palmer 2011;Zembylas 2007). Studies such as these lend support to my argument for understanding space as a material 'multiplicity' (Massey 2005, 9).…”
Section: Theoretical Contexts: Space Objects Bodies and Materialitymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…See, e.g., Elfström, 2013;Dahlberg & Moss, 2005;Olsson, 2008. 14. See, e.g., Hultman, 2011;Hultman & Lenz Taguchi, 2010;Lenz Taguchi, 2010;Palmer, 2011;Westberg Bernemyr, 2015. 15.…”
Section: Notesunclassified
“…There is an increasing number of studies that employ diffractive methodologies in educational research (e.g. Bozalek & Zembylas, 2016;Lenz Taguchi & Palmer, 2013;Palmer, 2011;Snaza & Weaver, 2015), even with regard to sexuality education (e.g. Cameron-Lewis, 2016; Renold & Ringrose, 2017) that is presenting important knowledge on the implications for curricula, policy development and pedagogical practices.…”
Section: Conceptual Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%