1995
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.1995.53.36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Many Stool Examinations are Necessary to Detect Pathogenic Intestinal Protozoa?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
60
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
60
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional examinations could increase prevalence detection rates, as reported by other investigators. 19 Three Schistosoma species have been detected in Equatorial Guinea: S. mansoni, S. haematobium, and S. intercalatum. 20 All schistosomiasis cases (S. intercalatum) in this survey were found in members of the Fang ethnic group from the mainland region, the focus of this disease in Equatorial Guinea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional examinations could increase prevalence detection rates, as reported by other investigators. 19 Three Schistosoma species have been detected in Equatorial Guinea: S. mansoni, S. haematobium, and S. intercalatum. 20 All schistosomiasis cases (S. intercalatum) in this survey were found in members of the Fang ethnic group from the mainland region, the focus of this disease in Equatorial Guinea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We could have missed some infections with this and other parasites by testing insufficient numbers of specimens during some illness episodes (13); by collecting routine stool specimens monthly rather than more often, which would have been impractical; and by using techniques that by present standards are suboptimally sensitive for detection of particular parasites. For example, UV fluorescence microscopy is now known to be more sensitive than examination of acid-fast-stained slides for detection of Cyclospora cayetanensis (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 In Cuba, microscopic faecal examination remains the mainstay of diagnostic proceeding for giardiasis and, due to its limitations, 24 it is recommended the examination of up to three faecal samples collected over alternative days. 25 Presumably, all health workers in Havana know this rule, but stricter adherence to it seems to be necessary. Alternatively, the diagnosis efforts for patients with gastrointestinal symptoms and suspected giardiasis were mainly concentrated on microscopy of duodenal aspirate, which has become the main diagnostic tool for it in APHCH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 It is necessary the examination of at least three faecal samples collected over alternate days and in this way, several days often pass between the initial suspicion of giardiasis and the final parasitological confirmation. 25 During this time, an untreated patient's condition may improve or will worsen. In our study, the median time between the first presentation to a health unit till the start of treatment of giardiasis was 6 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%