2020
DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How many human pathogens are there in Laos? An estimate of national human pathogen diversity and analysis of historical trends

Abstract: ObjectiveThe emergence of infectious diseases pose major global health threats. Estimates of total in-country human pathogen diversity, and insights as to how and when species were described through history, could be used to estimate the probability of new pathogen discoveries. Data from the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Laos) were used in this proof-of-concept study to estimate national human pathogen diversity and to examine historical discovery rate drivers.MethodsA systematic survey of the French and E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diverse other infectious diseases are common in Laos, 47 but there are very limited AMR data available. Intrinsic AMR is important for melioidosis and rickettsial diseases, reducing the spectrum of efficacious antibiotic therapy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Diverse other infectious diseases are common in Laos, 47 but there are very limited AMR data available. Intrinsic AMR is important for melioidosis and rickettsial diseases, reducing the spectrum of efficacious antibiotic therapy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority (49%) of data sources on AMR and AMU were from one site, at LOMWRU/ Mahosot Hospital. Though the number of publications on infectious diseases in Laos has greatly increased since 2000, 47 88 there are few articles that specifically describe the AMU and AMR situations in Laos. Fifteen percent of the data sources on AMR and AMU in this review were not peer-reviewed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation