2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How many cells are required for successful DNA profiling?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in which keratinisation stage the cells are in, hence if the DNA within the cells is highly degraded the PCR amplification will naturally fail [25]. 4) The CC method does not detect single molecules of cell-free DNA in the fluorescence microscope at 100X magnification [12,19]. Other studies have shown that cell-free DNA is present in biological material deposited after skin contact [13,26,27], hence this could be a substantial factor to a person's shedder status that is not captured by the applied Diamond TM dye and CC method.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…in which keratinisation stage the cells are in, hence if the DNA within the cells is highly degraded the PCR amplification will naturally fail [25]. 4) The CC method does not detect single molecules of cell-free DNA in the fluorescence microscope at 100X magnification [12,19]. Other studies have shown that cell-free DNA is present in biological material deposited after skin contact [13,26,27], hence this could be a substantial factor to a person's shedder status that is not captured by the applied Diamond TM dye and CC method.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared the cell count method (CC method) to the classical handheld tube method (HH method). For the CC method we used Diamond™ nucleic acid dye which is a fluorescent dye that binds to the grooves of the DNA molecule [18], in both cell-free and nuclear DNA; however cell-free DNA is unlikely to be detected by microscopy using 220X or less magnification [12,19]. The number of cells that appear as bright spots in a fluorescence microscope, within a fingerprint, was counted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single cells are considered ltDNA (low-template DNA), and handling such material is not uncommon in forensics, where specialists are often faced with low-quantity and low-quality DNA. Since such samples are treated with special lab protocols (e.g., increased number of PCR cycles), it makes them prone to stochastic effects (drop-ins and dropouts) and increased stutter ratios, the interpretation of ltDNA profiles is a common topic of discussion [ 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ]. An alternative to traditional fragment analysis is to sequence the bi-allelic SNPs, which are less prone to artifacts and are characterized by smaller amplicons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genomic DNA analysis was performed on cells sampled from proband and both parents by buccal swab technique [11]. Exomes and flanking splice junctions were captured using the IDT xGen Exome Research Panel v1.0 (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, Iowa USA).…”
Section: Testing Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%