How limiting deceptive practices harms consumers

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Abstract There are two competing sellers of an experience good, one offers high quality, one low. The low-quality seller can engage in deceptive advertising, potentially fooling a buyer into thinking the product is better than it is. Although deceptive advertising might seem to harm the buyer, we Terms of use: Documents inshow that he could be better off when the low-quality seller can engage in deceptive advertising than not. We characterize the optimal deterrence rule that a regulatory agency seeking to punish deceptive practices should adopt. We show that greater protection against deceptive practices does not necessarily improve the buyer-welfare. * We are indebted to Benjamin Hermalin (the Editor) and two anonymous referees for insightful suggestions.

“Survival Value and a Robust, Practical, Joyless Individualism”: Thomas Nixon Carver, Social Justice, and Eugenics

“…As pointed out by Arthur J. Vidich and Stanford M. Lyman this represents a "remarkable instance of blaming the victim for his condition." (Vidich and Lyman 1985, 81) 23 This section is indebted to Peart and Levy (2013).…”

“…In Carver's words, "This may explain every known fact regarding the difficulty which the Negro, the Indian, or the Malay has in adjusting himself to the white man's civilization" (453). 23 Carver's activities in Los Angeles were not limited to academia. In the autumn of 1934, he was invited to deliver a series of talks to business and community leaders at the Los Angeles University Club on the subject What Can Be Done With Our Present Economic System?…”

Fake Sales: A Dynamic Pricing Perspective

“…For instance, Glaeser and Ujhelyi (2010) and Hattori and Higashida (2012) study sellers with the ability to deceive through false claims about products that consumers naively believe. Piccolo et al (2015) and Rhodes and Wilson (2018) instead study consumers who make rational inferences based on possibly false claims about quality. As in our paper, Piccolo et al (2015) emphasise that false claims can induce firms to charge lower prices, which can leave consumers better off.…”

On Adverse Effects of Consumers’ Attaching Greater Importance to Firms’ Ethical Conduct

“…Finally, whereas our paper is concerned with the concealment of information, there is of course literature addressing outright dishonesty in other domains (e.g., [20] in the domain of advertising).…”