2020
DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1823022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How large is the periablational zone after radiofrequency and microwave ablation? Computer-based comparative study of two currently used clinical devices

Abstract: Purpose: To compare the size of the coagulation (CZ) and periablational (PZ) zones created with two commercially available devices in clinical use for radiofrequency (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA), respectively. Methods: Computer models were used to simulate RFA with a 3-cm Cool-tip applicator and MWA with an Amica-Gen applicator. The Arrhenius model was used to compute the damage index (X). CZ was considered when X > 4.6 (>99% of damaged cells). Regions with 0.6 Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhou et al, who compared 44 MWA with 347 RFAs and 46 cryoablations, did show a significant association between the RENAL nephrometry score and LTP for all patients [ 20 ]. Since MWA provides larger ablation zones with higher temperatures [ 26 ], size and central location would be less of an issue, only our results and literature suggest counter-wise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Zhou et al, who compared 44 MWA with 347 RFAs and 46 cryoablations, did show a significant association between the RENAL nephrometry score and LTP for all patients [ 20 ]. Since MWA provides larger ablation zones with higher temperatures [ 26 ], size and central location would be less of an issue, only our results and literature suggest counter-wise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…and ΔE = 2.814 ×10 5 Jmol -1 [32].The D99 thermal damage contour is employed as in [8] to evaluate the thermal damage contour, i.e. the isoline Ω = 4.6 which corresponds to 99% of cell death probability according to the following equation:…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the effective electric conductivity σ e and the relative permittivity ε r , are considered temperature dependent as in [8,42], so are defined as follows:…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations