2004
DOI: 10.1002/jae.797
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How large is the bias in self‐reported disability?

Abstract: SUMMARYA pervasive concern with the use of self-reported health measures in behavioural models is that individuals tend to exaggerate the severity of health problems in order to rationalize their decisions regarding labour force participation, application for disability benefits, etc. We re-examine this issue using a self-reported indicator of disability status from the Health and Retirement Study. We study a subsample of individuals who applied for disability benefits from the Social Security Administration (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, little bias was observed when the responses of Health and Retirement Study participants were compared to the criterion standard of U.S. Social Security Administration disability insurance benefit decisions [26]. The outcome of workforce exit was based on the “labor force status” variable in the RAND Health and Retirement Study Data file [27], which summarizes the labor force status for each respondent at each interview into mutually exclusive categories of “working full-time,” “working part-time,” “unemployed,” “partly retired,” “retired,” “disabled,” or “not in the labor force” [28].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, little bias was observed when the responses of Health and Retirement Study participants were compared to the criterion standard of U.S. Social Security Administration disability insurance benefit decisions [26]. The outcome of workforce exit was based on the “labor force status” variable in the RAND Health and Retirement Study Data file [27], which summarizes the labor force status for each respondent at each interview into mutually exclusive categories of “working full-time,” “working part-time,” “unemployed,” “partly retired,” “retired,” “disabled,” or “not in the labor force” [28].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However the literature is conflicting on the extent of state-dependent reporting bias in subjective measures of health [2,10,1417]. Faced with this uncertainty, measures of health that are believed to be more objective have been proposed and used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a model is increasingly used when there is an a priori reason to expect a dependent binary variable to be simultaneously determined with a dichotomous regressor [2931]. There was, however, statistical evidence of a significant negative correlation in the disturbance terms between two equations, which appears to be counterintuitive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%