How Korean Psychiatric Staff Deal with Religious and Spiritual Issues of Patients: What Is Professional?

Lee, Eun-Mi; Baumann, Klaus

doi:10.3390/rel10100544

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In 2016 we added 3 more samples from known NERSH collaborators: A sample of Brazilian resident physicians by Lucchetti (N = 171), a South Korean sample of psychiatric staff members by Lee et al (N = 281) [22,23] and a sample of Swiss physicians used in the thesis by Münger (N = 79) [24] . In addition, we performed a citations search in Web of Science, and systematic literature searches (Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science and Google Scholar) [25] .…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Physicians’ religious/spiritual characteristics and their behavior regarding religiosity and spirituality in clinical practice

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Religiosity and/or spirituality (R/S) of physicians have been reported to inform behavior regarding religiosity and spirituality in clinical practice (R/S-B). Our aim was to study this association. Methods: Building upon a large international data pool of physician values we performed network and systematic literature searches using Google Scholar, Web of Science, Embase, Medline, and PsycInfo. Measures for R/S and R/S-B were selected for comparability with existing research. We performed a two-stage IPDMA using R/S coefficients from sample-wise multiple regression analyses as summary measures. We controlled for age, gender, and medical specialty. An additional sub-analysis compared psychiatrists to non-psychiatrists. Results: We found 11 eligible surveys from 8 countries (n = 3159). We found a positive association between R/S and R/S-B with an overall R/S coefficient of 0.65 (0.48–0.83). All samples revealed a positive association between R/S and R/S-B. Only 2 out of the 11 samples differed from the overall confidence interval. Psychiatrists had a higher degree of R/S-B, but associations with R/S did not differ compared to non-psychiatrists. Conclusions: We confirmed a significant association between R/S and R/S-B in this study. Despite large cultural differences between samples, coefficients remained almost constant when controlling for confounders, indicating a cultural independent effect of R/S on R/S-B, which to our knowledge has not been documented before. Such interaction can constitute both facilitators and barriers for high quality health care and should be considered in all aspects of patient and relationship-centered medicine.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Physicians’ religious/spiritual characteristics and their behavior regarding religiosity and spirituality in clinical practice

et al. 2021

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Further studies in these populations are needed to confirm or refute this claim, including validation using changes in wording" (2010, p. 84). To date, one such replication study exists: Lee and Baumann (2019) investigated DUREL in South Korea, among psychiatric staff in the city of Daeugu and suburbs of Chilgok and Yeongcheon.…”

Section: Combinational Micro-level Approachesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The other 16 are journal articles published in: the Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (10), Religions (3), International Journal of Behavioral Development (1), Personality and Individual Differences (1), and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (1). Combined, the Asian countries studied in all the sampled micro-level publications included: Turkey (7), China (4), Taiwan ( 3), South Korea (3), India (2), Indonesia (2), Israel (2), Thailand (2), Bangladesh (1), Burkina Faso (1), Cyprus (1), Japan (1), Jordan (1), Kuwait (1), Kyrgyzstan (1), and Russia (1): (Bender 2013;Roberts 2016;Salvatore et al 2020;Güngör et al 2012;Bennett and Einolf 2017;González 2011;Gries et al 2012;Hu et al 2017;Liu 2010;Moaddel and Karabenick 2018;Sarkissian 2012;Voas 2014;Wei and Liu 2013;Zhai and Woodberry 2011;Yilmaz et al 2016;Cohen et al 2017;Huber and Huber 2012;Koenig and Büssing 2010;Lee and Baumann 2019).…”

Section: Asiamentioning

confidence: 99%

Studying Religiosity and Spirituality: A Review of Macro, Micro, and Meso-Level Approaches

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper seeks to advance the global study of religiosity and spirituality by conducting a meta-analysis of major approaches in the field. While the field, and thus the collected publications, are dominated by Western approaches, particular attention is paid in this analysis to publications from geographies that are not from the United States or Western Europe, especially these world regions: Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Similarly, while the study of religiosity is considerably centered around Christianity, this analysis extends beyond Christianity, to the extent possible in extant studies, to include publications investigating other world religious traditions, such as African spirituality, African witchcraft, Afro-Caribbean religious traditions, Buddhism, Confucianism, folk religions, Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, Mormonism, Neo-paganism, New Religious Movements (NRMs), Shamanism, Sikhism, Spiritism, Taoism, and spirituality generally. A total of 530 publications were reviewed, and the studies are categorized by unit of analysis into: Macro, micro, and meso-level. Measurement constructs include religious demography, culture, belonging, behaving, believing, bonding, religious salience, spiritual identities, religious networks, occupations, congregations, denominations, and faith-based organizations. Non-Western sources and approaches are analyzed toward furthering future research in under-studied world regions. Implications are drawn for the field, such as the need to geo-code publications at the country level.

show abstract

Spiritual Needs in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy

Baumann

Lee

Reiser

2021

Spiritual Needs in Research and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How Korean Psychiatric Staff Deal with Religious and Spiritual Issues of Patients: What Is Professional?

Cited by 4 publications

References 17 publications

Physicians’ religious/spiritual characteristics and their behavior regarding religiosity and spirituality in clinical practice

Physicians’ religious/spiritual characteristics and their behavior regarding religiosity and spirituality in clinical practice

Studying Religiosity and Spirituality: A Review of Macro, Micro, and Meso-Level Approaches

Spiritual Needs in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About