How K12 Teachers’ Readiness Influences Their Intention to Implement STEM Education: Exploratory Study Based on Decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior

Abstract

Teachers are the key factors in ensuring the effectiveness of STEM education, and their intentions deeply influence their teaching practices. The existing research about the influencing factors of teachers’ intentions to implement STEM education has some problems, such as small sample sizes, being limited to teachers of a single subject, and the need for optimization of the theoretical model relied on. This research, based on the decomposed theory of planned behavior combined with the readiness of teachers, formed an assumption model of the factors influencing teachers’ STEM education intentions from the aspects of attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control. Questionnaires were sent to 532 K12 general teachers in China. A structural equation model (SEM) was used to analyze recycled data and verify the assumption model. The results show the following: (1) The educational readiness of K12 teachers in China was at an upper–middle level. Among them, the level of emotional readiness was the highest, while the level of behavioral readiness was the lowest. (2) The STEM behavioral intention of teachers was at an upper–middle level, and attitudes and perceived behavioral control had direct significant impacts on teachers’ intentions to engage in STEM education. Perceived usefulness, self-efficacy, and behavioral readiness were the three strongest indirect impact factors. (3) The emotional readiness of the teachers directly affected their intentions to implement STEM education. Behavioral readiness and cognitive readiness indirectly had an impact on teachers’ intentions to implement STEM education by influencing self-efficacy.

Deciphering Kyrgyz science and mathematics teachers’ STEM teaching readiness

“…A study by Abdullah et al (2017) measured three aspects of STEM teaching readiness among 190 Malaysian science and mathematics teachers, including cognitive readiness (i.e., the readiness of a teacher to think creatively and critically design a concept to solve problems), affective readiness (i.e., the continuum of emotional readiness of teachers [positive, neutral, and negative] to carry out their duty), and behavioral readiness (i.e., the actual knowledge and skills of teachers in doing something new) (p. 7). Related thereto, a study by Wu et al (2022) found that affective readiness…”

STEAM Education and the Innovative Pedagogies in the Intelligence Era

“…Wu and coworkers [12] in their paper, How K12 Teachers' Readiness Influences Their Intention to Implement STEM Education: Exploratory Study Based on Decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior, examine the factors that affect K12 teachers' intentions to implement STEM education in China. Using a decomposed theory of planned behavior combined with teacher readiness, the authors developed an assumption model of the factors influencing teachers' STEM education intentions.…”

Deciphering Academicians' Usage of Artificial Intelligence among Academicians in Higher Education Institutions

“…For instance, a study by Roy et al (2022) and Chai et al (2020) indicated that perceived behavioral control was the best predictor of both science teachers' and students' intentions to employ AI in the educational setting. The availability of resources (Gado et al, 2022), the degree of training (Wu et al, 2022), and the perceived usability of AI (Yan et al, 2014) are only a few examples of the variables that can affect perceived behavioral control. Academics are more likely to plan to use artificial intelligence (AI) in their teaching when they feel they have the tools, education, and expertise to do so.…”