How Is the Probability of Reporting Various Levels of Pain 12 Months After Noncatastrophic Injuries Associated with the Level of Peritraumatic Distress?

Abstract

BackgroundPsychological factors have been shown to be consistent predictors of chronic pain in people with musculoskeletal injuries. However, few prognostic studies have considered multiple risk factors including peritraumatic distress. In addition, previous research has not considered that the associations between peritraumatic distress and pain levels can vary across pain outcomes.Question/purposeTo determine whether an easily measurable level of baseline distress is associated with pain levels 1 year after noncatastrophic traumatic injuries when the outcome to be assessed is not normally distributed.MethodsThis was a prospective cohort study. The data were captured from two cohorts in London, Ontario, Canada, and Chicago, IL, USA. Participants were adults with acute noncatastrophic (that is, not treated with surgery or hospitalization) musculoskeletal injuries of any etiology with various injury locations (60% [145 of 241] spinal and 40% [96 of 241] peripheral) that presented to local urgent care centers. Other inclusion criteria included English/French speakers and having no other disorder that would affect their pain levels. In total, between the years 2015 and 2018, 241 participants were recruited based on the inclusion criteria. Ninety-three percent (225 of 241) of participants provided baseline data, and of these, 48% (109 of 225) were lost to follow-up in 1 year. Based on a complete case approach, this study included 116 participants who ranged in age from 18 to 66 years and 69% (80) of whom were women. The Traumatic Injuries Distress Scale (TIDS) was used to evaluate distress at baseline (within 4 weeks of injury). The TIDS is a validated, reliable 12-item risk prognosis screening tool that takes less than 3 minutes to complete with questions regarding uncontrolled pain, negative affect, and intrusion/hyperarousal. The minimum and maximum possible scores are 0 and 24, with higher scores indicating higher levels of distress. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) was used to assess the pain level at baseline and again 12 months postinjury. To complete the NPRS, participants rate the severity of their pain on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain imaginable. NPRS scores of 1 to 3 indicate mild pain, 4 to 6 indicate moderate pain and 7 or higher indicate severe pain. As a preliminary analysis, to assess whether the participants as a group experienced recovery, a paired samples t-test was used to compare NPRS scores at baseline and 12 months. In all, 52% (60 of 116) of participants reported no pain (NPRS = 0), and mean pain intensity scores improved from 4.8 ± 2.1 at baseline to 1.6 ± 1.6 at 12-month follow-up (p < 0.001). Quantile regression was used to describe the association between baseline distress and pain levels 1 year after the injury. This technique was used because it reveals the relationships at different quantiles of the pain outcome distribution.ResultsThe results indicate some people (52% [60 of 116]) recovered regardless of their baseline level o...

CORR Insights®: What Is Important to Patients Who Are Recovering From an Open Tibial Fracture? A Qualitative Study

“…Still, such studies need to use prospective, randomized, or at least cohort designs to see the true effect. Modarresi et al [6] showed that this can be done in a relatively small number of patients. Increasing awareness of the physical, emotional, and societal costs of open tibia fractures will lead to increased funding for research to investigate the psychosocial component for recovery from injury and surgery.…”

“…The average interview time was 53 minutes. To be more practical for orthopaedic surgeons with limited time available in clinic, we need a fast and reliable screening tool for identifying patients who have less than ideal coping strategies in order to help find them resources [6]. As indicated in the paper, resources available online were very helpful for patients since they're readily available to patients with internet access.…”

CORR Insights®: Which Psychological and Electrodiagnostic Factors Are Associated With Limb Disability in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome?

“…One of the main barriers of screening for psychological factors like depression, anxiety, catastrophic beliefs about pain, and heightened levels of distress is that most orthopaedic surgeons feel as though such work is beyond their expertise. A recent study published in CORR [5] described a new scale, the Traumatic Injuries Distress Scale (TIDS), which predicted pain-related outcomes after acute musculoskeletal injuries. The TIDS questionnaire takes patients less than 3 minutes to complete, and the authors found that it reliably anticipated which patients who presented with noncatastrophic orthopaedic injuries were more likely still to have pain a year later [5].…”

“…A recent study published in CORR [5] described a new scale, the Traumatic Injuries Distress Scale (TIDS), which predicted pain-related outcomes after acute musculoskeletal injuries. The TIDS questionnaire takes patients less than 3 minutes to complete, and the authors found that it reliably anticipated which patients who presented with noncatastrophic orthopaedic injuries were more likely still to have pain a year later [5]. Importantly, the TIDS questionnaire focuses on patients' self-perceived relationships to pain, as well as issues of affect, intrusive thoughts, and hyperarousal [5].…”

“…The TIDS questionnaire takes patients less than 3 minutes to complete, and the authors found that it reliably anticipated which patients who presented with noncatastrophic orthopaedic injuries were more likely still to have pain a year later [5]. Importantly, the TIDS questionnaire focuses on patients' self-perceived relationships to pain, as well as issues of affect, intrusive thoughts, and hyperarousal [5]. While more research is needed, this type of questionnaire may remove a key barrier for orthopaedic surgeons-the feeling among orthopaedic surgeons that discussions pertaining to our patients' mental health is beyond our expertise or scope of practice.…”