2017
DOI: 10.1002/2016ja023318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How is the Jovian main auroral emission affected by the solar wind?

Abstract: The influence of the solar wind on Jupiter's magnetosphere is studied via three‐dimensional global MHD simulations. We especially examine how solar wind density variations affect the main auroral emission. Our simulations show that a density increase in the solar wind has strong effects on the Jovian magnetosphere: the size of the magnetosphere decreases, the field lines are compressed on the dayside and elongated on the nightside (this effect can be seen even deep inside the magnetosphere), and dawn‐dusk asym… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
65
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
10
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As plasma rotates through dawn into the dayside magnetosphere, it is constrained by the magnetopause and forced closer to the planet. As a consequence its velocity increases, and the truej×trueB force required to keep the plasma in corotation is decreased (Chané et al, ; Kivelson & Southwood, ; Walker & Ogino, ). Additionally, the solar wind dynamic pressure acts to balance the outward radial stresses, and so weaker azimuthal currents are present in the dayside magnetosphere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As plasma rotates through dawn into the dayside magnetosphere, it is constrained by the magnetopause and forced closer to the planet. As a consequence its velocity increases, and the truej×trueB force required to keep the plasma in corotation is decreased (Chané et al, ; Kivelson & Southwood, ; Walker & Ogino, ). Additionally, the solar wind dynamic pressure acts to balance the outward radial stresses, and so weaker azimuthal currents are present in the dayside magnetosphere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to circumvent the difficulty of numerically integrating the MHD equations in the presence of strong spatial gradients (without drastically reducing the spatial resolution of the numerical grid), Tanaka () proposed to solve the MHD equations by splitting the global magnetic field B into an intrinsic potential magnetic field B 0 and a residual magnetic field B 1 . This technique has been widely applied to MHD simulations of planetary magnetospheres since then (e.g., for recent studies of Saturn, Jia et al, ; Jupiter, Chané et al, ; or Uranus, Cao & Paty, ). However, in Tanaka (), the background magnetic field B 0 was assumed to be potential (i.e., current‐free) and time independent.…”
Section: Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observations from these intervals suggest an increase in the UV auroral brightness and hectometric auroral radio emission intensity following the arrival of an interplanetary shock (Clarke et al, ; Gurnett et al, ; Nichols et al, , ), in conflict with the predictions of Cowley and Bunce () and Southwood and Kivelson (). Recent MHD simulations also suggest that the main auroral emission would brighten in response to an increase in solar wind dynamic pressure (Chané et al, ). However, both the UV auroral brightness and auroral radio emissions can change in response to changes internal to the magnetosphere without any external solar wind activity.…”
Section: Background and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%