How is perceived community cohesion and membership in community groups associated with children’s dietary adequacy in disadvantaged communities? A case of the Indian Sundarbans

Abstract

BackgroundMembership in community groups and a sense of community cohesion may facilitate collective action in mobilizing resources towards better health outcomes. This paper explores the relationship of these factors, along with individual level socio-economic variables, to dietary adequacy among children below 6 years of age, a proximate determinant of child malnutrition.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey in Patharpratima block of the Sundarbans in West Bengal, India, using a two-stage, 30 cluster random sampling design. In 1200 sampled households, we used a structured questionnaire to interview mothers of children below 6 years of age on their child’s nutritional intake. We also interviewed household heads to assess perceived community cohesion using a nine item scale, membership in any community self-help organization, and other socio-economic determinants. We used a logistic regression model to assess their association with a minimum acceptable diet among children between 6 months to 6 years.ResultsOnly 9.33 % children between 6 and 71 months of age received a minimum acceptable diet. With each increase in the perceived community cohesion score (scale 0-9), a child is 1.31 times more likely to have minimum acceptable diet (95 % CI 1.14, 1.50). The odds of minimum acceptable diet were also higher among children whose mothers had primary education (2.09, 95 % CI 1.03, 2.94) as compared to illiterate mothers and in households with surplus food resources (2.72, 95 % CI 1.32, 5.58) as compared to those without surplus or deficit. In contrast, registering at an Anganwadi (government early child development) centre (odds ratio 1.34 95 % CI 0.69, 2.60) and community membership (odds ratio 0.93, 95 % CI 0.59, 1.46) were not associated with minimum acceptable diet.ConclusionThe results are consistent with what is known about the importance of maternal education and access to food resources in ensuring that children have a minimum acceptable diet. Perceived community cohesion seems to play a positive role in children’s diets. Further research needs to clarify which community characteristics and services are the most relevant, how they can better support children’s diets, and how interventions can strengthen these community characteristics and services.

Neighbour home gardening predicts dietary diversity among rural Tanzanian women

“…In the Rufiji population, anecdotal evidence suggests that neighbours have high community cohesion and value reciprocity; they are often expected to share their food resources with neighbours who are food insecure. Our hypothesis that neighbour home gardening and community food sharing may play a role in dietary diversity is supported by a study from India, in which perceived community cohesion was shown to predict child dietary diversity among disadvantaged populations ( 21 ) . By this logic, it is plausible that productive home gardens also improved neighbours’ dietary diversity if households who grow crops also share their produce with their neighbours.…”

Membangun Kesatuan Bangsa melalui Pendekatan Pemberdayaan Sosial dan Budaya Masyarakat Papua

“…Untuk benarbenar mencapai persatuan dan kohesi sosial, semua suara harus didengar dan semua perspektif dipertimbangkan dalam pengembangan kebijakan dan program. Hanya melalui praktik inklusif kita dapat menciptakan masyarakat yang lebih adil dan adil bagi semua individu (Barman & Vadrevu, 2016;Fouani, 2020).…”

Health threats of climate change: from intersectional analysis to justice-based radicalism

“…Although revealing the poor state of public health, these studies failed to explain how such conditions are produced and how entry points can be located to mitigate these emerging threats. As suggested by Mukherjee et al (2012a, b), Paterson et al (2014), WHO (2015), Barman and Vadrevu (2016), Banwell et al (2018), Hossain et al (2021), Amorim-Maia et al ( 2022) and many similar studies, this work adopts an intersectional approach and situates the analysis into the global, regional, and local economic, political, and sociocultural processes to move beyond rhetorical nobility and challenge the dominant global adaptation discourse, norms, practices, and policies.…”