2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-019-04408-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How invasive oysters can affect parasite infection patterns in native mussels on a large spatial scale

Abstract: Declaration of authorship: MAG, DWT and JVDM conceived and designed the study. MAG, RN, MM, CB and KMW conducted fieldwork. MAG, RN and MM performed parasite dissections. PCL conducted the molecular identification. EOF and AMW compiled data on biotic and environmental variables. MAG conducted the statistical analyses with input from JVDM. MAG and DWT wrote the manuscript with significant contributions of all other authors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Probably P. websteri prefers the relatively thick oyster shells over the much thinner shells of other species, like mussels Mytilus edulis. Such a preference for oyster shells has also been reported from the native shell-boring polychaete Polydora ciliata infecting mussels and oysters in the Wadden Sea (Goedknegt et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Probably P. websteri prefers the relatively thick oyster shells over the much thinner shells of other species, like mussels Mytilus edulis. Such a preference for oyster shells has also been reported from the native shell-boring polychaete Polydora ciliata infecting mussels and oysters in the Wadden Sea (Goedknegt et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Also, Goedknegt et al . (2019), during their sampling in the Wadden Sea, did not detect any significant correlation between prevalence and abundance of H. elongata and R. roscovita and salinity. However, their study was conducted in a different system, where the salinity gradient goes from 22 to 31, the lowest limit corresponding to our highest values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Prevalence and abundance of R. roscovita in mussels increased with host size (mussel length), whereas this was not observed for H. elongata . A positive correlation between parasite prevalence, abundance and host size was already shown in previous studies in the North Sea (Thieltges et al ., 2010; Goedknegt, 2019) and could be attributed to higher filtration rates occurring in larger mussels (Nikolaev et al ., 2006), which enhance the chance of more cercariae to enter the mussel through the inhalant current (Wegeberg et al ., 1999; Thieltges and Reise, 2007). In terms of time of exposure, the age of mussels could be another explanation and the higher number of metacercariae detected in larger – and older – mussels could be a result of parasite accumulation through time (Nikolaev et al ., 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the shell boring polychaete Polydora ciliata which infects the shells of wild molluscs in European seas has been acquired by the Pacific oyster C. gigas which is cultured in oyster farms and has also spread outside farms. In the wild, the parasite is more prevalent in Pacific oysters than in blue mussels M. edulis (Goedknegt et al., 2019), potentially leading to an interspecific spillback effect for wild mussels (Goedknegt et al., 2019). Another example comes from Atlantic salmon S. salar which is cultured along the Chilean Pacific coast and has become infected with copepods Caligus rogercresseyi and nematodes Hysterothylacium aduncum originating from a wide range of wild host species (Sepúlveda et al., 2004).…”
Section: Aquaculture Impacts On Wildlife Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%