2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.intell.2008.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How intelligence and education contribute to substance use: Hints from the Minnesota Twin family study

Abstract: In old and even middle age, there are associations between physical health and both intelligence and education. This may occur because intelligence and/or education exert effects on lifestyle choices that, in turn, affect later health. Substance use is one aspect of lifestyle choice in young adulthood that could play such a role. The effects of intelligence and/or education on substance use could be direct and environmental, or indirect due to the presence of confounding genetic and shared family influences. W… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
39
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
9
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The measures of substance consumption that we use in Study 1 reflect NCDS respondents' behavior throughout their adulthood in their 20s, 30s, and 40s, whereas those that we use in Study 2 reflect Add Health respondents' behavior in their early adulthood in their 20s. Note that previous studies of American samples find a positive effect of intelligence on smoking (Johnson et al, 2009), while those of British samples find a negative effect Batty, Deary, & Macintyre, 2007). So this appears to be a consistent and replicable national difference between the United States and the United Kingdom.…”
Section: Differences Between Ncds and Add Healthsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The measures of substance consumption that we use in Study 1 reflect NCDS respondents' behavior throughout their adulthood in their 20s, 30s, and 40s, whereas those that we use in Study 2 reflect Add Health respondents' behavior in their early adulthood in their 20s. Note that previous studies of American samples find a positive effect of intelligence on smoking (Johnson et al, 2009), while those of British samples find a negative effect Batty, Deary, & Macintyre, 2007). So this appears to be a consistent and replicable national difference between the United States and the United Kingdom.…”
Section: Differences Between Ncds and Add Healthsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Similarly, a behavior genetic analysis of twin pairs from the Minnesota Twin Family Study shows that, controlling for genetic and shared environmental influences, men and women with higher IQ at age 17 are more likely to use alcohol at age 24 (Johnson, Hicks, McGue, & Iacono, 2009).…”
Section: Alcoholmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the authors report a skewed study population with regard to low socioeconomic position (Windle and Blane, 1989). Another twin study from the United States, found a positive association between IQ test results at age 17 and an alcohol use composite, where, for example, symptoms of alcohol abuse/dependence and average quantity consumed in the past 12 months were considered (Johnson et al., 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scientific literature on intelligence and alcohol consumption in adolescence, measured as total intake and type of drinking, is scarce. A twin study from the United States showed that a high IQ assessed at age 17 was associated with heavier alcohol use as measured by an alcohol use composite, taking into account symptoms of alcohol abuse/dependence, number of intoxications, frequency of use and number of drinks during a year, and maximum number of drinks within 24 hours (Johnson et al., 2009). A study from Switzerland investigated how IQ test results from conscription were associated with frequency of drinking, defined as nondrinking, rare drinking (1 to 5 times/y), occasional drinking (1 to 5 times/month), moderate drinking (1 to 5 times/wk), and daily drinking.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the main challenge to that assumption is that, at least in adolescence, obtaining access to substances has been associated with higher cognitive abilities (Castellanos-Ryan, Johnson, Hicks, McGue, & Iacono, 2009;White & Batty, 2012). Cognitive abilities are therefore construed as providing an advantage for accessing resources, such as substances which have several motivational properties (Hyman, Malenka, & Nestler, 2006).…”
Section: Antisocialmentioning
confidence: 99%