2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2012.07.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How information influences an individual opinion evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individual usually has three decisions about online public opinions: agreement, neutral, and opposition [22]. The eWOM also has three forms: good, medium and bad reviews.…”
Section: Ras Model and Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Individual usually has three decisions about online public opinions: agreement, neutral, and opposition [22]. The eWOM also has three forms: good, medium and bad reviews.…”
Section: Ras Model and Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second one is to receive the message, but does not accept it. The third is ignore the message, or neutral [22]. When consumers are planning to buy a product, they often refer to the product's online reviews first [6].…”
Section: Ras Model and Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various types of opinion dynamics models in the social¯eld 3,4 have been proposed on how individualopinion is changed by the interaction with others under the in°uence of the news media and other information. [5][6][7][8][9][10] Many of these approaches are the so-called agent-based model whose focuses are to discuss the microscopic feature of the opinion of individual people. [11][12][13] The opinion is in general the subjective cognition or the view of value to a certain matter, whereas the concern or the interest in the matter is clearly di®erent from the opinion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that model, the convergence time relies heavily on the memory length. Other personal factors, such as contrarians [21] and individual awareness [22] have already been studied, and their influence on the final opinion distribution has proven to be notable. In actual social networks, the interaction among agents is not always symmetrical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%