2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2778054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Important is the Type of Working Contract for Job Satisfaction of Agency Workers?

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the small effect size could be the product of TAWs' low expectations concerning job stability in their non-standard work arrangements. TAWs may be willing to accept their current employment situation in order to avoid unemployment and to enhance their chances of obtaining permanent positions in user companies (Petilliot, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the small effect size could be the product of TAWs' low expectations concerning job stability in their non-standard work arrangements. TAWs may be willing to accept their current employment situation in order to avoid unemployment and to enhance their chances of obtaining permanent positions in user companies (Petilliot, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One explanation for these inconsistent findings is the use of mixed samples comprising dissimilar kinds of temporary work, such as persons temporarily employed by employers directly and temporary agency workers (TAWs) employed by agencies on fixed-term or permanent contracts. Unfortunately, former studies have not taken the heterogeneity of temporary work into account (Petilliot, 2016) and consequently have not considered employment-specific characteristics of different employment forms (Wagenaar et al, 2012). In our view, combining these conceptually distinct groups contaminates results and poses a threat to the validity of findings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Petilliot (2016) explores the importance of the type of work contract to the satisfaction of agency workers. De Cuyper et al (2008) find that workers who are employed on flexible contracts, such as fixed-term contracts, agency contracts, and seasonal contracts, on average report a lower level of job satisfaction as a group than workers who are employed on a permanent contract.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Petilliot (2016) explores the importance of the type of work contract to the satisfaction of agency workers. De Cuyper et al (2008) find that workers who are employed on flexible contracts, such as fixed-term contracts, agency contracts, and seasonal contracts, on average report a lower level of job satisfaction as a group than workers who are employed on a permanent contract.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%