2004
DOI: 10.1080/1351034042000238149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How important are new constitutions for democratic consolidation? Lessons from the post-communist states

Abstract: This article examines the conventional wisdom that an early legal break with the past is critical for democratic consolidation and finds it to be problematic. The postcommunist cases in central east Europe demonstrate that the liberal formula of free and fair elections followed by the ratification of a new constitution is not always desirable and may be sub-optimal when state sovereignty has not recently undergone redefinition. Since both semi-presidential and parliamentarian constitutions have framed stable d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 4. Whereas many works of legacy analysis consider the durability of singular institutions such as welfare systems, constitutions, and party systems (Geddes 1995; Inglot 2003; Stanger 2004), others consider the influence of pre-rupture institutions on attitudinal and behavioral outcomes (La Porte and Lussier 2011). In a 2013 working paper titled “What is a Historical Legacy?,” Jason Wittenberg helpfully suggests that legacy arguments are most compelling when independent and dependent variables are not phenomenologically the same. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 4. Whereas many works of legacy analysis consider the durability of singular institutions such as welfare systems, constitutions, and party systems (Geddes 1995; Inglot 2003; Stanger 2004), others consider the influence of pre-rupture institutions on attitudinal and behavioral outcomes (La Porte and Lussier 2011). In a 2013 working paper titled “What is a Historical Legacy?,” Jason Wittenberg helpfully suggests that legacy arguments are most compelling when independent and dependent variables are not phenomenologically the same. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%