2017
DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How implicit theories of sexuality shape sexual and relationship well-being.

Abstract: How do people believe they can best maintain sexual satisfaction in their romantic relationships? In the current research, we draw upon the literature on implicit theories of relationships to develop and validate a scale examining 2 types of lay beliefs about how sexual satisfaction can be maintained over time. Individuals high in sexual growth beliefs think that sexual satisfaction is attained from hard work and effort, whereas individuals high in sexual destiny beliefs think that sexual satisfaction is attai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
97
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 171 publications
6
97
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First, previous empirical work on long-term romantic passion has found that declines in romantic passion are the norm rather than the exception, suggesting a relatively grim prognosis for the notion of enduring passion (Acker & Davis, 1992;Hatfield et al, 2008;Hatfield et al, 1984;Traupmann & Hatfield, 1981;Tucker & Aron, 1993). However, a newer and growing body of research has begun to identify the circumstances under which people are more versus less likely to sustain passion over time (Aron et al, 2000;Birnbaum et al, 2016;Impett et al, 2008;Maxwell et al, 2017;Muise et al, 2013;Welker et al, 2014). The present work builds on this research by offering a systematic investigation of creativity-a novel and potentially important predictor of the maintenance of long-term passion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, previous empirical work on long-term romantic passion has found that declines in romantic passion are the norm rather than the exception, suggesting a relatively grim prognosis for the notion of enduring passion (Acker & Davis, 1992;Hatfield et al, 2008;Hatfield et al, 1984;Traupmann & Hatfield, 1981;Tucker & Aron, 1993). However, a newer and growing body of research has begun to identify the circumstances under which people are more versus less likely to sustain passion over time (Aron et al, 2000;Birnbaum et al, 2016;Impett et al, 2008;Maxwell et al, 2017;Muise et al, 2013;Welker et al, 2014). The present work builds on this research by offering a systematic investigation of creativity-a novel and potentially important predictor of the maintenance of long-term passion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, neuroticism (Russell & McNulty, 2011) and attachment insecurity (Little, McNulty, & Russell, 2010) were not associated with poorer relationship satisfaction among married individuals who reported relatively more frequent or satisfying sex. Other sexual processes can have similar effects (Burke & Young, 2012; Maxwell et al, 2017). For example, Maxwell et al (2017) recently demonstrated that people who feel more (vs. less) sexually compatible with their partners are less likely to incur relational costs from believing sexual outcomes are fixed and immutable.…”
Section: Sex As a Moderator Of Relationship Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interdependence matters. Some readers might view our call to increase dyadic invariance modeling as overburdensome and unnecessary in light of the extent to which close relationship researchers already evaluate invariance using multi-group confirmatory factor analysis approaches (e.g., Karantzas, Feeney & Wilkinson, 2010;Maxwell et al, 2017;Schrodt et al, 2009;Whisman & Li, 2015). Although we agree it is a good thing that relationship researchers have made efforts to establish the invariance of the measurement structures upon which they rely, we have already described how this process fails to take the interdependent nature of dyadic data into account during the invariance testing process.…”
Section: Why Bother?mentioning
confidence: 99%