2018
DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.12955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How I investigate Eosinophilia

Abstract: Eosinophilia is typically secondary, that is, reactive, in nature and is associated with a wide variety of neoplastic and non‐neoplastic disorders. Clonal eosinophilia is also seen in a wide variety of hematopoietic neoplasms, and sub‐classification can be diagnostically challenging. A proper evaluation of persistent eosinophilia involves correlation of clinical history, laboratory data, cellular morphology, and ancillary testing. Knowledge of appropriate ancillary testing is necessary for a timely diagnosis. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, at the end of ch14.18/ CHO LTI (d18), a strong increase of neutrophil counts occurred (2.7-, 1.6-, 1.6-, 1.9-and 2.3 fold increase vs. baseline, for cycle 1-5, respectively), indicating a ch14.18/CHOdependent effect on this cell population (Figure 2c and d). In contrast to neutrophils, we observed an increase of eosinophil counts following IL-2 on d8 (3.1-, 6.4-, 6.0-, 6.3-and 6.3 fold increase vs. baseline for cycle 1-5, respectively) that was further elevated during the combinatorial treatment in all cycles resulting on d15 in eosinophilia (threshold 350 cells/ µl) 27,28 in 90% of the treated patients (9.5-, 6.2-, 6.9-, 6.2-and 9.1-fold increases vs. baseline for cycle 1-5, respectively) ( Figure 2e). Trough levels on d1 in cycles 2-5 were about 3-fold increase compared to the baseline.…”
Section: Impact Of Il-2 and Ch1418/cho Treatment On Immune Cell Popumentioning
confidence: 62%
“…However, at the end of ch14.18/ CHO LTI (d18), a strong increase of neutrophil counts occurred (2.7-, 1.6-, 1.6-, 1.9-and 2.3 fold increase vs. baseline, for cycle 1-5, respectively), indicating a ch14.18/CHOdependent effect on this cell population (Figure 2c and d). In contrast to neutrophils, we observed an increase of eosinophil counts following IL-2 on d8 (3.1-, 6.4-, 6.0-, 6.3-and 6.3 fold increase vs. baseline for cycle 1-5, respectively) that was further elevated during the combinatorial treatment in all cycles resulting on d15 in eosinophilia (threshold 350 cells/ µl) 27,28 in 90% of the treated patients (9.5-, 6.2-, 6.9-, 6.2-and 9.1-fold increases vs. baseline for cycle 1-5, respectively) ( Figure 2e). Trough levels on d1 in cycles 2-5 were about 3-fold increase compared to the baseline.…”
Section: Impact Of Il-2 and Ch1418/cho Treatment On Immune Cell Popumentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Paraneoplastic reactive eosinophilia has been reported in both hematologic and solid malignancies including ovarian [ 5 , 6 ], bronchial [ 3 , 7 ], gastrointestinal [ 2 , 8 ], hepatic [ 9 ], renal [ 10 ] and thyroid [ 11 ] cancers, in addition to sarcoma [ 12 ]. Although pulmonary involvement can be seen in up to 25% of patients with HE and hypereosinophilic syndrome, asthma symptoms are uncommon [ [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone marrow biopsy showed hypercellular bone marrow (80%) with marked bone marrow eosinophilia. Genetic studies including BCR/ABL1, KIT Asp816Val & JAK2 V617F gene mutation analysis, florescent in situ hybridization (FISH) for CHIC2 (4q12) deletion, FGFR1 (8p11.2) rearrangement and PDGFRB/TEL translocation [ 5 , 12 ] were all negative.…”
Section: Case Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the outliers (H11 and H17) showed an elevated platelet count and eosinophilia, respectively. Eosinophilia has been linked to a wide variety of non-neoplastic disorders, as well as to neoplastic conditions [37] and an elevation in eosinophils may exert protumor effects [38,39]. On the other hand, inflammation and platelet activation at the site of tissue damage is known to contribute to initiate a cascade of events, which promote tumorigenesis [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%