2011
DOI: 10.1155/2011/375059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Hyperpolarization and the Recovery of Excitability Affect Propagation through a Virtual Anode in the Heart

Abstract: Researchers have suggested that the fate of a shock-induced wave front at the edge of a “virtual anode” (a region hyperpolarized by the shock) is a key factor determining success or failure during defibrillation of the heart. In this paper, we use a simple one-dimensional computer model to examine propagation speed through a hyperpolarized region. Our goal is to test the hypothesis that rapid propagation through a virtual anode can cause failure of propagation at the edge of the virtual anode. The calculations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conduction velocity is large in the virtual anode; rapid propagation through a virtual anode is thought to be one mechanism for the upper limit of vulnerability. 7 The wave front and conduction velocity profile are reproduced for the area around the virtual electrode as shown in Figs. 9 and S2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conduction velocity is large in the virtual anode; rapid propagation through a virtual anode is thought to be one mechanism for the upper limit of vulnerability. 7 The wave front and conduction velocity profile are reproduced for the area around the virtual electrode as shown in Figs. 9 and S2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, sequential light pulses can be applied repetitively, as charging of capacitors to generate ICD electrical shocks is not required. The flexibility of using spatially and temporally shaped light patterns for defibrillation could also be used to minimize secondary pro-arrhythmic effects, which are discussed to be a major cause for electrical defibrillation failure (Charteris and Roth, 2011).…”
Section: Clinical Implications Of Optogenetic Defibrillationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These so-called virtual electrodes (Wikswo et al, 1995) consist of a virtual cathode with depolarization in a dog bone shape (Akar et al, 2001) and a perpendicular virtual anode with hyperpolarization parallel to the fiber orientation (Knisley, 1995; Neunlist and Tung, 1995; Sambelashvili et al, 2003) which can be even larger than the virtual cathode (Nikolski et al, 2004). For decades successful defibrillation has only been attributed to the depolarized tissue while the hyperpolarization is considered to generate new wavefronts by a anode-break mechanism (Cranefield et al, 1957) or create a phase singularity which can trigger a new excitation and generate a new arrhythmic wavefront (Efimov et al, 1998; Roth, 1998; Charteris and Roth, 2011). However, the specific effects of hyperpolarization in the intact heart could not be addressed experimentally so far because it is impossible to predict or control the extent of the virtual electrodes induced by electrical field stimulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%