2012
DOI: 10.1103/revmodphys.84.987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How higher-spin gravity surpasses the spin-two barrier

Abstract: International audienceAiming at nonexperts, the key mechanisms of higher-spin extensions of ordinary gravities in four dimensions and higher are explained. An overview of various no-go theorems for low-energy scattering of massless particles in flat spacetime is given. In doing so, a connection between the S-matrix and the Lagrangian approaches is made, exhibiting their relative advantages and weaknesses, after which potential loopholes for nontrivial massless dynamics are highlighted. Positive yes-go results … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
352
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(359 citation statements)
references
References 184 publications
7
352
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, there are different "no-go" theorems putting serious constraints on such theories, especially in flat spacetime (see e.g. [48] and references within). On the other hand, we have significant higher spin results: free fields can be constructed in the same manner as in lower spin cases (see, e.g.…”
Section: Geometry In Effective Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, there are different "no-go" theorems putting serious constraints on such theories, especially in flat spacetime (see e.g. [48] and references within). On the other hand, we have significant higher spin results: free fields can be constructed in the same manner as in lower spin cases (see, e.g.…”
Section: Geometry In Effective Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In section 3 we test the consistency of a factorized conformal wave operator in generic backgrounds 2 See e.g. [22] and references therein for a review of various no-go theorems and [33] for a stronger version of the Coleman-Mandula theorem in flat space.…”
Section: Jhep06(2014)066mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most importantly, the experimental resolution, limited by statistical errors at present, is not enough to resolve the SM-BSM interference term in the cross section, which is instead dominated by the quadratic new physics contribution. 22 For this reason, positivity constraints do not improve sizably our constraints on m * and g * .…”
Section: Jhep11(2017)020mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22] for a review). Yet, the roots of these arguments are based on the IR properties of the states, i.e.…”
Section: Jhep11(2017)020mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation