2012 First International Workshop on User Evaluation for Software Engineering Researchers (USER) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/user.2012.6226573
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How helpful are automated debugging tools?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, they have not been widely adopted in practice. Moreover, automated debugging approaches are often unable to indicate the "true" locations of faults [7]. Other more interactive methods, such as slicing and query languages, help developers but, to date, there has been no evidence that they significantly ease developers' debugging activities.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, they have not been widely adopted in practice. Moreover, automated debugging approaches are often unable to indicate the "true" locations of faults [7]. Other more interactive methods, such as slicing and query languages, help developers but, to date, there has been no evidence that they significantly ease developers' debugging activities.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roßler [7] advocated for the development of a new family of debugging tools that use contextual information. To build context-aware debugging tools, researchers need an understanding of developers' debugging sessions to use this information as context for their debugging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%