2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Have We Diagnosed Early-Stage Lung Cancer without Radiographic Screening? A Contemporary Single-Center Experience

Abstract: BackgroundThe National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), which demonstrated a reduction in lung cancer mortality, may result in widespread computed tomography (CT)-based screening of select populations. How early-stage lung cancer has been diagnosed without screening, and what proportion of these cases would be captured by a screening program modeled on the NLST, is not currently known. We therefore evaluated current patterns of early-stage lung cancer presentation.Methodology/Principal FindingsWe performed a singl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, the enormous potential of LDCT has been conclusively demonstrated by the NLST trial, which has provided a rationale for LDCT screening in high-risk ever-smokers. However, NLST selection criteria are not optimal and may exclude many patients with early lung cancer as shown in a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with stage I–II lung cancer, where just 48% met the NLST inclusion criteria for age and smoking [ 157 ]. Furthermore, one study estimated that just 26.7% of lung cancers diagnosed in the United States were covered by NLST criteria, using data from SEER (surveillance, epidemiology and end results) [ 158 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, the enormous potential of LDCT has been conclusively demonstrated by the NLST trial, which has provided a rationale for LDCT screening in high-risk ever-smokers. However, NLST selection criteria are not optimal and may exclude many patients with early lung cancer as shown in a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with stage I–II lung cancer, where just 48% met the NLST inclusion criteria for age and smoking [ 157 ]. Furthermore, one study estimated that just 26.7% of lung cancers diagnosed in the United States were covered by NLST criteria, using data from SEER (surveillance, epidemiology and end results) [ 158 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because a decreasing proportion of early stage lung cancers are initially detected due to symptoms, 5 increasingly they are detected incidentally during radiographic evaluation performed for other reasons. Patients with medical comorbidities may be more likely to undergo such imaging studies, 37 whether as a component of routine disease surveillance, preoperative screening for surgical procedures, or during acute hospitalizations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Earlier work at our institution has demonstrated that the reason for initial imaging and diagnosis, timeliness of diagnostic evaluation and therapy, treatment selection, and overall survival in patients with early stage and locally advanced disease differ according to socioeconomic status. 58 Reasons for these disparities remain unclear. Potential explanations include system-level factors, provider preferences, patient preferences, and patient fitness for therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, in the meantime, much attention has also been paid to symptoms, especially initial respiratory symptoms, that may indicate the incidence of lung cancer 10 - 12 . It was suggested that many patients with lung cancer had subtle shifts in symptoms when they were diagnosed and the majority of them were actually caused by the cancer 13 , 14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%