How have the Eastern European countries of the former Warsaw Pact developed since 1990? A bibliometric study

Abstract

Did the demise of the Soviet Union in 1991 influence the scientific performance of the researchers in Eastern European countries? Did this historical event affect international collaboration by researchers from the Eastern European countries with those of Western countries? Did it also change international collaboration among researchers from the Eastern European countries? Trying to answer these questions, this study aims to shed light on international collaboration by researchers from the Eastern European countries (Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia). The number of publications and normalized citation impact values are compared for these countries based on InCites (Thomson Reuters), from 1981 up to 2011. The international collaboration by researchers affiliated to institutions in Eastern European countries at the time points of 1990, 2000 and 2011 was studied with the help of Pajek and VOSviewer software, based on data from the Science Citation Index (Thomson Reuters). Our results show that the breakdown of the communist regime did not lead, on average, to a huge improvement in the publication performance of the Eastern European countries and that the increase in international co-authorship relations by the researchers affiliated to institutions in these countries was smaller than expected. Most of the Eastern European countries are still subject to changes and are still awaiting their boost in scientific development.

Computer science in Eastern Europe 1989-2014: a bibliometric study

“…Thus, Karamourzov (2012) analysed development trends in the Commonwealth of Independent States and demonstrated the large, and in some cases, near catastrophic, reductions in scientific activity that have taken place. Kozak et al (2014) showed that the break-up of the Block did not result in significant increase in publication counts or in academic collaborations with international researchers. Radosevic and Yoruk (2014) compared the science and social science capabilities of the countries of Central and Eastern Europe with those of the longestablished members of the European Union.…”

A bibliometric approach to tracking big data research trends

“…Hence, citation analysis helps researchers to obtain a preliminary idea about the articles and research that has an impact in a particular field of interest and it deals with the examination of the documents cited by scholarly works [29,30]. In addition, there are various bibliometric studies has been evaluated based on different metrics and applications such as forecasting emerging technologies by using bibliometric and patent analysis [31], multiple regression analysis for Japanese patent case [32], medical innovation using medical subject headings [33], based on region or countries [34][35][36], number of authors [37,38] and a bibliometric analysis based on number publications and cited references [39].…”

Innovation in Russia: The Territorial Dimension

“…While import substitution may result in short-term improvements of technological capabilities, insufficient access to the often tacit complementary knowledge required to create cutting-edge products is likely to act as a drain on innovative performance in the long run. Recent trends provide cause for concern, with MNEs considering divestment (Jost, 2015) and Russian researchers' international collaborations trending downward (Kozak et al, 2015). Our analysis strongly suggests that it would not be major agglomerations like Moscow but remote regions whose performance would be most severely affected by reduced integration in global networks.…”