2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-022-05104-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Have Corporate Codes of Ethics Responded to an Era of Increased Scrutiny?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper has approached this issue from the responsible business approach and the role of ethical codes. More recent studies, such as Loughran et al (2022), continue to highlight the variety of motivations that can lie behind developing a code of ethics. This work is based on a purposive group of companies that would correspond to the group that Bodolica and Spraggon (2015) identified as “promoters”, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This paper has approached this issue from the responsible business approach and the role of ethical codes. More recent studies, such as Loughran et al (2022), continue to highlight the variety of motivations that can lie behind developing a code of ethics. This work is based on a purposive group of companies that would correspond to the group that Bodolica and Spraggon (2015) identified as “promoters”, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is renewed interest in the structural composition of codes of ethics to close this gap between business policy and ethical practice in organisations and help company leaders establish and promote an ethical culture (Loughran et al , 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MSIs can be defined as ‘initiatives governing social and/or environmental standards of production that have participants from both business and societal interest groups as members and governance structures allowing for an equal possibility of input among the different partners in steering the initiative’ (Fransen, 2012, p. 166). This parity not only sets the MSI apart from other forms of private regulation, such as firm‐specific codes of conduct (Loughran et al, 2023), but it also differs from rules set by governments and intergovernmental organizations (Dentchev et al, 2017), like the OECD. In particular, MSIs seem to hold the potential for interactive learning between societal groups with distinct identities and interests (de Bakker et al, 2019) as well as for effective consensus‐building between them, thus being able to offer solutions that are likely to be accepted and implemented by all the parties involved (Sebhatu & Enquist, 2022).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In firms that prioritize sustainability performance, CG is more likely to have a direct responsibility for sustainability issues. For instance, managers' reporting on sustainability practices has grown dramatically as a result of stakeholder demand for the disclosure of corporate operations (Loughran et al, 2023).…”
Section: Sustainability Performance Of Firms and Governancementioning
confidence: 99%